Election Fraud Legal Team Wants to Present ‘Specific Evidence’ on Jan. 6 – IOTW Report

Election Fraud Legal Team Wants to Present ‘Specific Evidence’ on Jan. 6

Geller Report:

Those who love liberty, justice and truth will applaud such testimony, leftists, looters, arsonists and destroyers will explode.

Trump Team Wants to Present ‘Specific Evidence’ on Jan. 6: Campaign Adviser Jason Miller

By Jack Phillips, The Epoch Times,  December 30, 2020

President Donald Trump’s campaign adviser said the team is aiming to present evidence during a potential congressional debate on Jan. 6 if lawmakers in the House and Senate object to states’ Electoral College votes.

As of Wednesday, it appears that at least one member of the Senate, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), and a number of House lawmakers will object to the electoral votes during the Joint Session of Congress. Hawley announced he would object to the electoral vote, pointing to previous Democratic efforts to do so during the 2004 and 2016 presidential elections. After the objection, an hours-long debate will occur.

Miller said that evidence could be presented in Congress, which would differ from what the Trump campaign presented in courts over the past several weeks. more

16 Comments on Election Fraud Legal Team Wants to Present ‘Specific Evidence’ on Jan. 6

  1. ….this also requires some degree of cooperation from Pence. Even if Pence were not an Establishment squish, he’s also a proven coward as he showed on his “standing on principles” with DOMA as Governor of IN right up until some gey mens screamed at him, upon which he immediately abandoned his “principles” and let the poofter meanies have what they want.

    ….no, no help from Pence.

    It doesn’t end without shooting.

    …now…
    …or later.

    …and history tells us that the longer the delay, the more will die…

    7
  2. OK, so Trump’s team gets 2 hours time to present their evidence to the Congress in the hopes that this will persuade them to do what exactly? To overturn the election and give it to Trump? So that the American people will know about the election fraud? They do know about it, the ones that are paying attention anyway. Is it to delay the process so that a new election can take place? Is it to spur SCOTUS into action so that they will look at the tainted votes and rule on them in the few states up fr grabs?

    Sure, I will watch the proceedings, but am not expecting anything to come of it.

    And SNS, I gotta tell you, these constant calls for violence and armed insurrection is not helpful. Yes, I can picture a scenario where ,God forbid, it does come to that, but for me, several civil liberties must be taken away for me in order to justify such extremes. So for now, my retort will be ,”You first”.

    4
  3. …if you disenfranchise people and take away their liberties and their right to even speak against the Governmrnt, just what do YOU think will happen, Rich Taylor? Do you think they will pass over you if you are simply sufficiently compliant?

    Is that how is works in China?
    Venezuela?
    Iran?
    The Soviet Union?

    …it doesn’t matter if I want a war over it or not, because history tells us war there will be. Its not optional.

    Not EVERYONE is content with hand wringing followed by compliance, and I am simply pointing out that it will not end peacefully, however “unhelpful” you may view that simple truth…

    7
  4. Where indeed are other R Senators? Tom Cotton turned out to be a fraud. You’d think Cruz would be front & center. I have a long memory and after our President’s 2nd term is over, Cotton et.al. can take any presidential aspirations and stick ’em where the sun don’t shine.

    4
  5. One thing we must all admit, as much as we appreciate and love Trump for all his good, he was horrible when it came to choosing important appointments and filling the most vital positions. Just one horrible mistake after another. Pence is a scumbag. He will stab Trump in the throat. Nobody wants to accept it but its sadly true. Pence is far more comfortable with Mconnel and is a rat. The most obvious tell is that the fake rat Christian will side with communist china over America. He will enable slavery, tyranny, imprisonment of descenters, assassination, torture, censorship, religious persecution, all the typical daily activities ofnthe ccp. Oh, and I forgot to mention the massive wide scale abortion mill operations, organ harvesting, experimentation, and all around horrific abuse of human beings by their ccp employers. China has burned hundreds of Christian churces to the ground, has executed tens of thousands of Christians, and has made successfully infiltrated the Catholic Church through the child molesting coke sniffer P Frankie. And Pence is a Christian? Please….

    Pence is another televangelist scumbag con man. Every time he speaks in that automatic fake preacher sermon routine he makes me want to vomit. His act is as bad as hitlery amd algore when they did the negro slave routine. Pence is Benedict Arnold x 1000. A true scumbag. Hopefully something really bad happens to him in the near future. I want thesatisfaction of enjoying watching it.

    2
  6. …but Rich Taylor, I am honestly curious about this statement.

    “…but for me, several civil liberties must be taken away for me in order to justify such extremes.”

    …so how many God-given rights is “too many” to allow to be taken away? If they take away your speech, well, that’s OK, maybe you shouldn’t say unapproved things? If they take away your arms (which can get pretty extreme and not be limited to guns, they made colonist break the po ints off their dinner k nives once), you would just shrug and say, well, its ok since they will protect me? If they decide to quarter their Antifa shock troops in your house, well, that’s only the first three rights, there’s still seven to go, so its not time yet?

    …seriously, since you are our self-appointed Jimmeny Cricket, in Rick Taylor’s view, how many lost civil liberties is TOO many? And does it matter WHO you lose them to, or WHY?

    …please tell me, this psychology is absolutely fascinating to me…

    4
  7. “…if you disenfranchise people and take away their liberties and their right to even speak against the Governmrnt, just what do YOU think will happen, Rich Taylor?”

    Crickey, you speak against the Government in just about everything you post, tell me, how has your right to speak out been curtailed? They obviously have not imprisoned you yet because you are still posting. Specifics please, who is threatening you for speaking out against the government?

    “…it doesn’t matter if I want a war over it or not, because history tells us war there will be. Its not optional.”

    Bullocks, MEN make war, not empty rhetoric, and its usually those men least aware of the consequences.

    ‘Not EVERYONE is content with hand wringing followed by compliance, and I am simply pointing out that it will not end peacefully, however “unhelpful” you may view that simple truth…”

    Despite your constant call to arms by typing comments on a blog, you really don’t know how it will end and whether it will be peacefully or not.

    “…so how many God-given rights is “too many” to allow to be taken away?”

    That is a real good question, and instead of chest-thumpingly stirring on those who will listen to violence, I wrestle with that question everyday, given our precarious position. It seems to me we’ve had this discussion before, where I tried to pin you down on specifics but you were having none of it. But since you asked me I will try to give you the courtesy of a reply. We can all agree that the election was tainted and stolen from the incumbent, but will this alone spur me to armed insurrection? NO, when Biden becomes the next president I will not start shooting government officials willy-nilly.

    The very fact that we are conversing on this blog is proof that my free speech, and yours, has not been infringed in any way. When they close the blog, lock up Fur and threaten to jail the rest of us if we persist, then we’ll talk.

    My right to practice my religion and my right to bear arms has not been infringed (yet), when it does, again, we’ll talk.

    As much as I hate what is happening to the country I love, nothing that has so far happened has required, to me, a need for civil war. Maybe you feel different, and if so, don’t hide behind the threat that the government will come after you, they haven’t yet, tell me why you think we should start shooting, as you have said so many times here, and what you intend to do about it.

    1
  8. M Ghandi, please don’t beat around the bush. Tell us what you really think about Mike Pence…

    Not that I disagree but I guess that I have been hoping to be proven wrong about him. There really are few heroes left in the world.

    And, you are dead on about President Trump’s appointments. How could someone who appears to be a brilliant strategist at times make such shitty decisions on the people he surrounds himself with? A mystery.

    2
  9. “The very fact that we are conversing on this blog is proof that my free speech, and yours, has not been infringed in any way.”

    So you haven’t noticed Youtube, Twitter, Facebook banning people and stories from Doctors, Scientists, New York Post etc. because it doesn’t fit their narrative.

    3
  10. “Despite your constant call to arms by typing comments on a blog, you really don’t know how it will end and whether it will be peacefully or not.”

    …I do not call to arms, nor would anyone respond to such of I did. I have said here many times that I am nobody and nothing, and have zero military experience. I have some practice with weapons of many descriptions, but I would not use them randomly or gladly if it were necessary, but in defense of family and country if need be.

    But you say I speak against the government, but I speak of the FUTURE, illegitimate government that is stealing the election. I do not, nor ever have, spoken against the duly elected and legitimately RE-elected President of the United States, which is and remains Donald Trump. Not locked up, you say? True enough now, but have you not heard the calls for re-education camps for Trump supporters from the Left? Have you head their putative puppets for The White House denounce them? No?

    …after the 20th, that arrest thing may well change, I’m pretty far down the list of priorities but commies get them ALL in the end…

    You, on the other hand, as an appeasement troll that keeps trying to get me to give you a timeline for felonies you keep trying to get me to confess to, have little to worry about. You are doing the devil’s work of telling everyone on this, and likely other, conservative blogs of telling folks there’s nothing you can do, so just roll over and accept a pedophile fraud whos beholden to China as your president and MAYBE he’ll leave you enough civil liberties that you can still try to pretend to be a free man.

    And there is absolutely NO possibility it will “end peacefully” regardless of if the there is armed conflict or not. If we fight, we did. Can’t sugarcoat that. And old idiots with only basic skills and no organization like me will be the first to go. But if we DONT fight, we will be economically strangled, our children raised by the State, our rights no more than the whim of a local apparatchik, and the aforementioned Maoist re-education camps the LEFT proposed loom, to be professionally run by folks trained by the genocidal Chinese as our cities burn and our right to defend ourselves against ANY depredation stripped away. You are all too aware of many, many examples of this, and again, if you look at States where Antifa, et al is established, its not like they will leave the Rich Taylors of this world alone simply because they seek to appease them.

    Appeasement does not work. You are very well aware of the historical examples of that, too.

    As for churches, I know nothing of where or what you worship, you could go to Flip Wilson’s Church of What’s Happening Now for all I know or care. Perhaps you go to a politically preferred denomination they have not molested yet, agajn doesn’t matter.

    But you can scarcely say that NO Church has been heavily restricted, even closed, by ham-handed governors under guide of COVID who apply stringent standards ONLY to churches and leave more sinful gathering places alone. Your stated personal experience is not one the rest of the nation has shared, and again, you know that very well.

    I do like this line, though;

    “When they close the blog, lock up Fur and threaten to jail the rest of us if we persist, then we’ll talk.”
    …you leave it rather unsaid HOW we will talk under such circumstances, the point being that when the ax falls the FIRST thing that goes is our ability to discuss it. Yes, they are letting us cut up like kids in study hall now because they know there’s no teeth in it, but were we to do as BLM and such do and start actually making plans and giving timelines for the exact same activites that leftist proudly crow about, I can guarantee that speech WILL result in jail time. Plenty of those stories out there too, also as I’m sure a bright fellow like you is aware of.

    …I still don’t know what you are, if you are one or many, troll or apologist, or if “Rich Taylor” is something you get a paycheck to be. You are clearly well educated and very skilled at pushing every conversation into appeasement territory and denigrating the fighting spirit of our Founders, I’ll grant you that, and because of that I tend to think that you are one person, that you do believe in what you’re saying, that you are nonetheless paid to say it, and that your beliefs are in line with those who would use Biden as a puppet to bring down this Nation. As such, your presence here is meant to dispirit any that would support the TRUE President of the United States and to perhaps set a snare for any who would cross the line into openly planning action, as you constantly try to do to me.

    You are dangerous, sir, deliberately so, and behind your meek words lies the executioners sword wielded by those that you support. As such, it is unlikely I will be able to convince you of anything as you have already chosen your path, and I will never be able to believe a single thing you say as you say all with an eye to ulterior motives. It saddens me that one so obviously talented and smart has chosen to use his God given skills to further the oppression of his fellow man, but it is what it is, and there’s little I can do about it.

    So do as you are paid to do and believe you must, in whatever way you wish. You may leave your pending ad homenim attack for others, but I believe that we are done but for your future sniping at me, as I am confident you will. Well, you ain’t the first and won’t be the last, and if that’s what brings you pleasure, you have my pity.

    Carry on, sir, carry on…

    4
  11. “So you haven’t noticed Youtube, Twitter, Facebook banning people and stories from Doctors, Scientists, New York Post etc. because it doesn’t fit their narrative.”

    As much as I disagree with their censorious policies, they are private companies, not the US government. The 1st Amendment (the free speech part) provides citizens protections against their own government from abridging their freedom of speech.

    SNS was complaining that his right to “speak against the government” was been infringed, that was what I was referring to.

    1
  12. “…I do not call to arms”

    Sure sounds like it do me with ,”…they’d do better to present arms…”, and ,”It doesn’t end without shooting.”

    “But you say I speak against the government, but I speak of the FUTURE, illegitimate government that is stealing the election.”

    Impotent parsing, I must say. Pointing out the obvious, when you slam Pence (like you did above) or criticize a politician, you are speaking out against the government and as of yet, nobody or no government entity has infringed on that right, have they?

    “True enough now, but have you not heard the calls for re-education camps for Trump supporters from the Left?”

    And you take the ramblings of lunatics as a forewarning of policy, Seriously?

    “…you leave it rather unsaid HOW we will talk under such circumstances”

    The same way people have talked through out history under similar circumstances, in taverns, on street corners, in homes. Of course, you conveniently ignored my premise of how likely that would even happen, care to tackle it now?

    As for the rest of your comment, calling me dangerous, a troll, an appeaser, a paid employee of who knows what, and calling into question my faith and patriotism, I’ve seen people like you my whole life. When faced with an inability to argue facts, they get lazy and take the easy route, attacking the other’s character. Your limited thinking can not countenance someone just as God fearing, just as country loving, having an opinion different from your own. You would make a good progressive, they suffer from the same malady.

    You seem like an amiable bloke and we share probably 98% of our world/moral views but you do yourself a disservice when you dismiss disagreements as nefarious in nature and not heartfelt. Charity goes a long way in that regard.

    1

Comments are closed.