Fed. judge blocks California law that bans magazines holding more than 10 bullets – IOTW Report

Fed. judge blocks California law that bans magazines holding more than 10 bullets

16 Comments on Fed. judge blocks California law that bans magazines holding more than 10 bullets

  1. Like it would have mattered to me if they were banned anyways.

    I already made my choice a few years ago about how I would live my life, and it didn’t include acquiescing to egregious legislative bullshit form ANY politician.

    Molon Labe

  2. RUMOR HAS IT, that drug lords and gang-bangers have volunteered to use less than 10 rounds in their magazines, to show solidarity to their democrat mission.

    Now if those stubborn WHITE PEOPLE would just go along with this, we could have real crime control measures in Cali.

  3. “So CA will be forced to accept standard capacity magazines, that’s good news.”

    Nope. This was purely about ownership or possession. We are still limited to 10 rounds max in ANY gun except rimfire. Naturally the criminals voluntarily comply. I hope it’s one of our Anti Gun Politicians family members that get’s it if I’m ever in a gun fight and need to swap mags while the bad guys doesn’t.

  4. Gun threads recently remind me of The Shootist, J.B.Books explaining gunfight psychology to young Ron Howard.
    And Undefeated, Hackman’s Sheriff Little Bill showing off for the Eastern dime novelist he acquired from English Bob.

  5. If I’m ever in a fight in modern suburban/urban America and I need to change mags, I was trapped by a full platoon of ISIS jihadis, not the usual 1 to 4 suburban parking lot/ATM thugs.

  6. When I saw the cover picture…My first thought was

    (In deep Southern Accent)

    ” Suh, it seems to Me You’ve disarmed Ronald Mcdonald…That was one angry Clown”

Comments are closed.