GP: A federal judge on Friday struck down California’s ban on high-capacity gun magazines.
US District Judge Roger Benitez, a George W. Bush appointee, in his ruling said, “there is no American tradition of limiting ammunition capacity.” The judge said detachable magazines “solved a problem with historic firearms: running out of ammunition and having to slowly reload a gun.”
“There have been, and there will be, times where many more than 10 rounds are needed to stop attackers,” Benitez wrote, according to CBS News. “Yet, under this statute, the State says ‘too bad.’”
The judge is absolutely correct.
California’s radical far-left Attorney General Rob Bonta immediately filed an appeal, however, the judge’s ban will remain in effect while the case is making its way through the legal system.
“We believe that the district court got this wrong,” Bonta said. “We will move quickly to correct this incredibly dangerous mistake.” more
gun control nwords, suck dick
” If you need 80 shots in a magazine, you shouldn’t….” get the jab… WTF!
FJB
Maybe if they tried criminal control there wouldn’t be any need gun control laws.
try getting obiden/pedocrat control first
in the meantime, Attorney General Bonta was surrounded by taxpayer funded security, all sporting 30 round magazines.
bon-turd & mewwick g.,
If they’d only try that hard to execute Milley.
Rooftop Koreans will tell you, 30 round magazines are where it’s at.
Washington State jumped on the same bandwagon. Let’s hope judges actually following the Constitution is contagious
10 rounders are OK if you’re going to be prone…that’s about it.
guns enable real humans to defend themselves from pedocrats
“we don’t want you law-abiding types to be able to shoot our constituent-thugs” – pedocrats of californication