Feminist Journal Published Hoax Paper About ‘Dog Rape Culture’ – IOTW Report

Feminist Journal Published Hoax Paper About ‘Dog Rape Culture’

BT: A top feminist academic journal published a hoax paper about “dog rape culture” that was the product of a group of mischievous professors looking to repair the broken pieces of academia.

Breitbart News published two reports on the hoax paper before its true nature was revealed by its authors: academics Helen Pluckrose, James Lindsay, and Peter Boghossian. Boghossian and Lindsay perpetrated a similar hoax in 2017 when they submitted an academic paper, “The Conceptual Penis” to various academic journals. The paper, which argued, amongst other things, that penises caused climate change, was published in an academic journal after a peer-review process.

“Much like members of a zealous church or religious cult, argument, and persuasion no longer work to convince many of these people,” Lindsay said after the “Conceptual Penis” paper was published. “While an event like this will be unlikely to stop them, it can put a significant crack in the intellectual edifice they are using to protect and promote their ultimately morally motivated beliefs.”

Breitbart News published a report in August about a “dog rape culture” study that had been published in one of the most influential women’s studies academic journals, Gender, Place, and Culture Keep Reading

14 Comments on Feminist Journal Published Hoax Paper About ‘Dog Rape Culture’

  1. Well…That is the only way most Liberal Women can get laid….

    Looking at You Chelsea…But not for too long…Or She’ll Medusa

    You…Turn Your face to stone…and Your Junk to Gelatin.

    (It’s Friday…Break out the Hooch!!!!!!!)

    4
  2. Sorry, this one is beyond me. Unless of course they’re talking about any liberal democrat as they all pretty much seem to be dogs.

    I’m sorry, did I type that and not just think it?

    Clink my alias and tell em Anymouse send you…

    3
  3. Anymouse'(s), guessing your Soros check is late again. Surprise, Surprise,, One is right, one is trash,,Share the name,,wonders more. Like LIR, the name is Snorky1.

  4. “While an event like this will be unlikely to stop them, it can put a significant crack in the intellectual edifice they are using to protect and promote their ultimately morally motivated beliefs.”

    No one stupid enough to believe “them”, will be bright enough to be “convinced”.

    No one bright enough to be “convinced”, need be told.

    (But, please, give me an opportunity to pay you, for your “work”.)

Comments are closed.