Forced Transgender Boy Quickly Returns To Normal After Removal From Mother’s Care – IOTW Report

Forced Transgender Boy Quickly Returns To Normal After Removal From Mother’s Care

Breitbart London: A seven-year-old boy has been removed from his mother’s care by the high court, after he was found to be suffering “significant emotional harm” due to his mother raising him as a girl.

The judge in the case slammed social services who had simply accepted that the boy should be treated as a girl.

The High Court judge hearing the case, Mr Justice Hayden, told the court that he believed the mother had been “absolutely convinced” that the boy “perceived himself as a girl” and was therefore determined to treat him as a girl, according to reports.

However, the boy, who cannot be named and is now living with his father, has naturally reverted to having masculine interests since leaving the care of his mother, the court heard.

Family court proceedings began about three years ago after the father raised a complaint that he was not allowed access to his son.  MORE

17 Comments on Forced Transgender Boy Quickly Returns To Normal After Removal From Mother’s Care

  1. Thank God!! Hopefully the “mother” (so-to-speak) will get tossed in the slammer for child abuse. This “transgender” thing is nonsense – and it’s also a mental disease – gender dysphoria. Time to start giving these people some psych care.

  2. My wife is a certified hypochondriac which sucks because she’s always chasing some strange ailment. The most recent has been orthodontic appliances for my oldest one’s straight teeth. Well maybe they’re off a half a millimeter, definitely not all jagged.

    At least she’s not trying to sex change the poor kid. So at least I’ve got that going for me.

  3. An ill equipped woman to raise a child of any gender, if there ever was one. Right out the gate she decides the child’s life should be one of suffering because of her twisted views.

  4. Before you start the celebration:

    “Justice Hayden commented upon the fact that the boy had settled in well with his father and his father’s partner, actively choosing, with no pressure from either adult, to pursue interests typically seen as masculine.”

  5. This is becoming common enough to be named – women (I haven’t seen a case of a man doing this) convincing their children they are the opposite sex, in almost all cases boys to girls. Trying to convince boys that pink is their favorite color, making them play with dolls or in the most extreme cases making them live as girls and claiming that is what they want. Almost a weird form of Munchausen where the fabricated illness is gender reassignment. This is dangerous and sick and I doubt many courts are going to get involved to stop it.

  6. @Boyd; good point but just about anywhere would be better then where he was.
    You have to wonder how many parents are out here in our two countries are doing the same thing. The damage being done to these children is incredible but our legal system as well as child welfare agencies don’t seem to know what to do and as a result do nothing.

  7. @ Boyd; Also keep in mind the term ‘partner’ doesn’t HAVE to mean same sex. It could possibly mean a heterosexual couple who live together but are not legally married. Same sex couple is the first thing that comes to mind now because the LGBT community has claimed the word as their own prior to same sex marriage being legal.

  8. Boyd sees the fly in this ointment-“…his father and his father’s partner”

    Out of the frying pan…

    How/why in the fuck did these two fucknuts meet up, get married and decide to inflict their idiocy on a child.

    You can’t mess with Mother nature and one way or another, there is going to be a major reset.

  9. As @Peter noted, the term “partner” is the new word for couples that are not married.
    It used to be “girlfriend” or “boyfriend”, but those are silly and juvenile.

Comments are closed.