Gingrich: Trump ‘wins with 324 electoral votes,’ and ‘leftists will be in total shock’ – IOTW Report

Gingrich: Trump ‘wins with 324 electoral votes,’ and ‘leftists will be in total shock’

Just The News: Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich on Monday predicted a resounding electoral college victory for President Trump and said that the president should issue a warning that any perpetrators of election violence and looting will be held accountable.

In an interview on “The Water Cooler” television program, Gingrich told host David Brody that on Election Day morning Trump should release a statement saying that efforts will be made to photograph anyone who participates in looting and violence and that perpetrators should anticipate getting arrested and sent to jail.

The former Georgia congressman predicted that Trump will trounce Democratic challenger Joe Biden by securing 324 electoral votes during the election contest. Such a win would far exceed the 270 electoral votes a candidate needs to clinch victory. more

27 Comments on Gingrich: Trump ‘wins with 324 electoral votes,’ and ‘leftists will be in total shock’

  1. 320 Electoral Votes 😁
    Will win the popular vote too 😁
    You damn Commies will be screaming at the sky, so get ready and break out your therapy animals, coloring books and your play-doh because your going to need it. 😁
    Let’s kickass and give President Trump four more year’s. MAGA 🇺🇸

    14
  2. Oh, yes, and one more thing, dear Lord, about our enemies, ignore their heathen prayers and help us blow those little bastards straight to Hell. Amen.

    Lt. Col. Moore, We Were Soldiers

    6
  3. @flip: You’ll have to ask Fur about that. As you can see from the watermark, it’s from IOTWReport.

    If I had to guess, though, I’d say it’s from Bintcam. Or possibly C**tcam.

    🙂

    4
  4. I wish I was so sure as Mr Gingritch, and Fanu, and Goethe, and Hesse, and Richard Allestree, and Enoch Powell.

    I find I’m not sure of anything but death and taxes.

    Gloria Patri, et Filio, et Spiritui Sancto,
    Sicut erat in principio, et nunc, et semper, et in saecula saeculorum. Amen.

    2
  5. I certainly hope Mr. Newt is correct. Cautiously optimistic he is. But as Yogi cautioned, it ain’t over till it’s over.

    Here’s an odd tale. My wife has been away several days. Last evening during a phone call she tells me she saw a news report about a Trump supporter who went in to vote early. But was told records showed he had already voted. Straight democrat.

    After checking records they determined the records were wrong. I don’t recall the reason. They voided the straight ticket vote, and allowed him to vote.

    However, how many records show other people have cast straight democrat votes, that might be people that do not go in to vote at all, and the democrat votes will stand and be counted? She did not recall if it was an in state report or from another state.

    I decide to see if I could find the story online, and did an internet search with “trump supporter attempts to vote early told he has already voted”.

    I was not surprised that on Google most of the first page results were stories saying Trump encourages supporters to try to vote twice or Trump supporters disrupt early voting.

    Using the same search phrase on duckduckgo the first page mostly had stories about Trump voting early or the number of people who have voted early. One story stating “no Trump did not vote twice”, and only one link to a politico report saying Trump created election confusion with double-voting. Of course everyone’s search results will be different.

    2

Comments are closed.