“I WOULD NOT ADVOCATE THAT WE PUT A MUSLIM IN CHARGE OF THIS NATION” – IOTW Report

“I WOULD NOT ADVOCATE THAT WE PUT A MUSLIM IN CHARGE OF THIS NATION”

ben carson 2

PickeringPost: And he is not backing down. Of course his jelly-backed GOP co-candidates immediately joined the Left media in roundly condemning his stance as unconstitutional. But Carson is just one of the frontrunners in the Republican race who has never been a politician and his candidacy is candidly refreshing.

 

If you are a Muslim you come as a total package.

 … Unlike Christianity, Islam IS the military, Islam IS the education process, Islam IS the treasury, Islam IS the judiciary, Islam IS the law (Shariah), Islam IS the subjugation of women and girls, Islam IS crucifixions, the severing of limbs and beheadings. Islam IS FGM, Islam IS the one and only Caliphate that must eventually rule over all Western infidels.  More Here

14 Comments on “I WOULD NOT ADVOCATE THAT WE PUT A MUSLIM IN CHARGE OF THIS NATION”

  1. If you follow politics and our president and can’t see how Clock-med plays into it, you don’t understand politics.

    Obama tweeted “Nice clock Ahmed” before any media outlet posted a pic of Ahmeds fake bomb.

    What did Obama know about the fake bomb and when did he know it?

    And the media has no interest. Anyone surprised?

  2. Loco, it’s not really that hard to find. Google it. You’ll find quotes like “If you live in the city you shouldn’t be allowed to own a semi automatic weapon”. This is no secret, I’m surprised you don’t know about it.

  3. Carson is correct on this one, Islam will/would not be subjected to the Constitution. And they are not a free people either. The ones that are cool with assimilating to America have in principle, turned their back on islam.

    I LOVE hearing those few who were once muslim, now christian, and speak out about it.

  4. I’m with Bad Brad. I don’t want another 4 or 8 years fighting to keep my guns and 2nd amendment rights. Mr. Carson is a good man, but too soft spoken for me and the gun “thing” keeps coming up, so I say no to him.

  5. It’s pretty chilling when you have a POTUS say something like:
    “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”
    Hey O’Baja, the Constitutional ‘scholar’, the BoR doesn’t protect Islam from criticism, what drives you to?
    Seems Islamists don’t need the help, they do a pretty good job of turning off people to Islam all on their own.
    How do you ‘slander’ a dead person from the 7th century?
    Harvard doesn’t put them out like they used to.

  6. Tempest in a Teapot.

    No Human wants to live under a Theocracy. PERIOD.

    The Theocrats are just as corrupt as the Demonrats and the Republicrats, except there is NO rule of law, and will kill you for whatever, or no, reason, whatsoever.

    They arrogate unto themselves (just as our SCROTUS does) the right to divine the meaning and purpose of their god – and brook no dissent.

  7. And for those muzzies who would publicly “convert”, I would respond, “taqiyya” and “hijrah”.
    In other words, I believe you about as far as I could throw you over my right shoulder with my left arm.

Comments are closed.