Is Oregon Fudging the Numbers on Child mutilation?

Liberty Nation-

Oregon is in a public records fight that could shape how people talk about child gender affirmation and discover how many child sex change procedures are actually happening. A Portland health advocate says he applied for a large set of health-insurance claims, which he’s done numerous times in the past, then the state pulled back when he said he wanted to study gender-affirming care, indicating there could be a political reason for not distributing the material. The Beaver State is being accused of skewing numbers when it comes to minors seeking and getting gender-altering procedures. more

14 Comments on Is Oregon Fudging the Numbers on Child mutilation?

  1. Oregon, as a reliably “blue” state, is not fudging the numbers.
    They’re flat out lying about them!
    The mere fact the they officially have “gender-affirming care” in place should tell you that they they are on a mission to cripple the next generation!
    The Left has a credibility rating of -40 on the Bozo Scale!

    10
  2. I’m firmly convinced that every last individual that is in any way, shape or form involved represents exactly who this applies to. No matter how you slice it, it’s not a oretty picture they have painted for themselves.

    New International Version
    It would be better for them to be thrown into the sea with a millstone tied around their neck than to cause one of these little ones to stumble.

    New Living Translation
    It would be better to be thrown into the sea with a millstone hung around your neck than to cause one of these little ones to fall into sin.

    English Standard Version
    It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck and he were cast into the sea than that he should cause one of these little ones to sin.

    Berean Standard Bible
    It would be better for him to have a millstone hung around his neck and to be thrown into the sea than to cause one of these little ones to stumble.

    Berean Literal Bible
    It is better for him if a millstone is hung around his neck and he is thrown into the sea, than that he should cause one of these little ones to stumble.

    King James Bible
    It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones.

    New King James Version
    It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck, and he were thrown into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones.

    New American Standard Bible
    It is better for him if a millstone is hung around his neck and he is thrown into the sea, than that he may cause one of these little ones to sin.

    NASB 1995
    “It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck and he were thrown into the sea, than that he would cause one of these little ones to stumble.

    NASB 1977
    “It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck and he were thrown into the sea, than that he should cause one of these little ones to stumble.

    Legacy Standard Bible
    It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck and he were thrown into the sea, than that he would cause one of these little ones to stumble.

    Amplified Bible
    It would be better for him if a millstone [as large as one turned by a donkey] were hung around his neck and he were hurled into the sea, than for him to cause one of these little ones to stumble [in sin and lose faith].

    Christian Standard Bible
    It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck and he were thrown into the sea than for him to cause one of these little ones to stumble.

    Holman Christian Standard Bible
    It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck and he were thrown into the sea than for him to cause one of these little ones to stumble.

    American Standard Version
    It were well for him if a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he were thrown into the sea, rather than that he should cause one of these little ones to stumble.

    Contemporary English Version
    would be better off thrown into the ocean with a heavy stone tied around their neck.

    English Revised Version
    It were well for him if a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he were thrown into the sea, rather than that he should cause one of these little ones to stumble.

    GOD’S WORD® Translation
    It would be best for that person to be thrown into the sea with a large stone hung around his neck than for him to cause one of these little ones to lose his faith.

    Good News Translation
    It would be better for him if a large millstone were tied around his neck and he were thrown into the sea than for him to cause one of these little ones to sin.

    International Standard Version
    It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck and he were thrown into the sea than for him to cause one of these little ones to sin.

    NET Bible
    It would be better for him to have a millstone tied around his neck and be thrown into the sea than for him to cause one of these little ones to sin.

    New Heart English Bible
    It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck, and he were thrown into the sea, rather than that he should cause one of these little ones to stumble.

    Webster’s Bible Translation
    It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should cause one of these little ones to fall into sin.

    Weymouth New Testament
    It would be well for him if, with a millstone round his neck, he were lying at the bottom of the sea, rather than that he should cause even one of these little ones to fall.

    5
  3. Is Oregon Fudging the Numbers on Child mutilation?
    Does a bear shit in the woods?
    Does a DildoCrat lie every time it opens its mouth?

    2
  4. That is a large number of young, mentally ill people being turned into trannies. We’ve seen how that often goes. It’s almost as if they are creating an army of potential assasins.

    7
  5. @ crazy Charlie MONDAY, 22 SEPTEMBER 2025, 11:46 AT 11:46 AM

    Mention Seattle and Gomorrah and everyone knows that you are referencing Portland.

    Both presented as “freethinking” as far back as I can remember. To hear them tell it “freethinking is the act of forming one’s own opinions and beliefs based on reason, logic, and evidence, rather than accepting traditions, authority, or established doctrines unquestioningly. A freethinker uses critical thought and inquiry to arrive at conclusions, especially in matters of religion, politics, and other controversial subjects. It is an approach that values rational investigation over faith or dogma, aiming for truth and ethical living through an open, inquisitive mindset.”

    What I recognized them as when I was younger was atheistic shitholes that had a critical mass that was under the influence of arrogant, narcissistic, power mad, nut jobs. I realized that they aren’t so much atheistic as they are Satanists. They believe in God, but they also believe that God occupies that place in the grand scheme of things justly belongs to them either individually or collectively.

    3
  6. @Conservative Cowgirl Monday, 22 September 2025, 13:23 at 1:23 pm

    But… Will “their” army of *potential* assassins, attack “our” army of *guaranteed* ass sitting tax payers? Or? Something else?

    I’m looking for the downside… the loss… to all. If “they” do. Anything. Other than sit, and pay.

    1
  7. @JDHasty Monday, 22 September 2025, 14:20 at 2:20 pm

    “[F]reethinking”.

    Teach an idiot to fish, and it will demand you (since you claim to know how) fish for it. (Enslave someone to “just follow orders” to) Enslave a genius to fish, your way? Now you’re ruling.

Comments are closed.