Jeff Clark Gives Solid Take on DOJ Trump Indictment Scheme – IOTW Report

Jeff Clark Gives Solid Take on DOJ Trump Indictment Scheme

CTH: Rather than write 10,000 highly specific and legally granular words to deconstruct the Trump indictment, I will share the opinion of others with supporting analysis and add some substance to the issues. Later I will compile all the various points of analysis into one very granular article.

First, it is important to always remember why this indictment is taking place.  The DOJ, specifically Lisa Monaco, are continuing the offensive against Trump in large part to cover for the actions of the Obama administration in the originating targeting of their political opposition.  Originating Spygate operations (’15-’16), Russiagate (’16-’17), Mueller (’17-’19), Impeachment #1 (’19-’20), Durham (’19-’23) and Jack Smith ’22-present, are all part of one long continuum of weaponized DOJ and FBI operations.  The entirety of the effort is to protect the actions taken by the Obama administration. [Note to congress: Questioning Durham this month is defense key #1]

In this interview {Direct Rumble Link} Jeff Clark gives his opinion of the statutory weaknesses that exist in the case as outlined in the indictment.  The first two defense approaches will likely be: (1) the Presidential Records Act supersedes the issues of document holding as noted in the use of the Espionage Act. (2) However, if the Espionage Act [Statute 793(e)] has to be defended, the originating issue of “unauthorized possession” will be the second approach heading to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.  WATCH:

3 Comments on Jeff Clark Gives Solid Take on DOJ Trump Indictment Scheme

  1. A sane and fair person would conclude a precedent was set when the DOJ did not indict Hildabeast, Biden, and RINO Pence for holding classified docs and in Hildabeast’s case, actually destroying electronic versions with a hammer.

    But no. Our government, the globalists, the enviro-wackos, and scumbags all over the world hate Trump. He’s in the way.

    1
  2. From an article on CNN today by media crank Dan Obeyadiah:

    Comey stated that in looking at previous Department of Justice investigations concerning “mishandling or removal of classified information” there was always some combination of the following: “clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice.”

    Willful mishandling – Hildabeast smashed electronic versions with a hammer, willfully.

    Efforts to Obstruct Justice – yes, Hildabeast again.

    Comey let her walk with a light slap on her wrist.

    But, according to Dan Obeyadiah, the two cases are as opposite as two ends of a magnet.

    Rubbish.

Comments are closed.