GP: A jury on Friday was deadlocked and unable to return a unanimous verdict in the murder trial for Arizona rancher George Alan Kelly.
George Kelly, the Arizona rancher who was arrested and charged with second-degree murder and aggravated assault for defending his wife and property from illegal invaders went on trial last month.
Kelly, 75, was arrested for killing Gabriel Cuen-Butimea, on his Arizona ranch in Kino Springs just outside of Nogales, Mexico on January 30, 2023.
According to reports, Gabriel Cuen-Butimea has a history of illegally crossing into the United States and multiple deportations.
According to the defense lawyers, Mr. Kelly fired warning shots after he saw a group of men dressed in camouflaged clothing point an AK-47 right at him. more here
No longer able to defend to property or your family.
We are now a disgrace to even third world countries.
Every once in a while the Ham Sandwich has a chance to win.
I hope it ends in his favor.
If an illegal was hit, you must acquit.
Looks like the jurors don’t understand common sense. If someone fires a warning shot what would you do?? I had a home invader once and I threw him out, I later was charged with assault. Here’s a hint I live in NY. I told everyone next time they would never find the body. No other home invaders found yet.
Now either the state will try to go after him again or the feds will, because democrats will not tolerate a white person defending their property against the brown hordes pouring over the border.
“…the jury sent a note to Santa Cruz Superior Court Judge Thomas Fink saying jurors could not reach a unanimous verdict.”
Doesn’t that mean he is found not guilty?
The prosecutor should be sued and prosecuted. Enough of this shit.
America has degenerated from what is right or wrong. Now it’s what prosecutors think they can get away with.
They didn’t find the bullet the killed the invader. They have no proof Kelly killed the dude. All they can prove is that he went outside and fired shots. If we believe in ‘innocent until proven guilty’ he should get acquitted.
Can anyone answer Jethro’s question above?
I suspect a hung jury results in a mistrial so the state will have a second go at him.
I have to agree that the case is purely circumstantial.
U.S. tort law wont protect him from civil judgent auch as O.J. experienced.
Guy never should have been charged, much less prosecuted.
Total bullshit, top to bottom.
mortem tyrannis
izlamo delenda est …
I agree with Tim. This is total commie BULLSHIT!
A ‘hung jury’ is a win for the state…because they have unlimited resources to keep trying their victim over and over. Even if Mr. Kelly eventually wins he will still have lost…because THE PROCESS IS THE PUNISHMENT.