Why do the dance? Drop the name!
ɹoʎɐɯoʇoS ɐᴉuoS ʎɐs sɹoɯnɹ
Gateway Pundit: Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito says he knows who leaked the Dobbs draft to Politico last year.
A draft of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade was leaked to Politico’s senior legal reporter Josh Gerstein last May.
Via Politico: “The Supreme Court has voted to strike down the landmark Roe v. Wade decision, according to an initial draft majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito circulated inside the court and obtained by POLITICO.”
Justice Alito’s opinion is a “full-throated, unflinching repudiation” according to Politico.
“Roe was egregiously wrong from the start,” Alito wrote. “We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled. It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.”
“This made us targets of assassination,” Alito said of the draft leak to Politico.
Earlier this year the Supreme Court issued a report on the Dobbs draft leak.
The report says the leaker could not be found and that new protocols for drafts have been put in place.
97 Supreme Court staffers were interviewed and signed sworn affidavits under penalty of perjury denying being the Dobbs draft leaker.
Justice Alito said despite this report, he likely knows who the leaker is. more
If it wasn’t 1 of 97 staffers then that narrows it down to 4 of 9.
you goan let the obiden d-sucker walk free?
I smell bullshit!
Of course they know who the “leaker” is.
If no one else does, Gerstein does, and nobody was very interested in finding out.
Same-oh; same-oh. Sort of like the FBI lying to the FISA court, the Epstein client list, Epstein’s “suicide,” Ray Epps and the phony “insurrection,” and Seth Rich. Nobody knows nothing.
The corruption is thick in the Supremes, the Agencies (including the Armed Forces), the House, the Senate, the Media, Academia, Wall St., and Madison Ave.
It’ll take a Hercules to clean these Augean Stables.
mortem tyrannis
izlamo delenda est …
I can’t tell you anything about a leak! I’m not a plumber!
97 staffers were interviewed and signed sworn affidavits. Presumably that was ALL the “staffers”. One can then draw only one conclusion; the leaker was one of the four progressives on the court. Roberts let him or her (probably her) off the hook, to likely blackmail them later.
Because a LIBTARD did it, NOTHING WILL BE DONE !!!!!
On the other hand, if a “conservative” farts in the wrong direction, all HELL would break loose… and there would be arrests, etc.
He has a moral obligation to make that knowledge public. Anything less is complicity.
So, help me out here:
“Alito likely knows who the leaker is.”. Meaning the author has drawn this conclusion.
or did they mean to say: “Alito knows who the likely leaker is.” Which is to say that even Alito is unsure but has an idea who it might be?
Either way, this is a nothing burger.
Habeus Corpus, baby!
Moral obligation, u funny guy. They just ruled they don’t have to answer to anyone.
Communist state in 1,2,3….
This all makes Donny giddy, being his idols are, Putin, Lil Kim & Xi.
Since Alito hasn’t exposed the name of the leaker then he should shut his flapping mouth. Perhaps the leaker was himself all along.