Kansas legally defines woman as ‘human female’ in new Women’s Bill of Rights – IOTW Report

Kansas legally defines woman as ‘human female’ in new Women’s Bill of Rights


PM:
On Thursday, Kansas legislators passed the Women’s Bill of Rights, becoming the first state in the union to pass a bill that defines a woman as a biological female.

The Daily Mail reports that the bill defines a woman as a person “whose biological reproductive system is developed to produce ova.” 

Speaking to the Washington Times, Senator Erickson, who spearheaded the bill, said, “What this does is simply codify in the law the definition of sex.”

“It simply says that in existing statute or law, where there is a definition of sex, it means biological male and female as determined at birth. That’s very factual, it’s very objective,” Erickson said. “There are legitimate reasons to distinguish between the sexes with respect to prisons, domestic violence shelters, rape crisis centers and other areas where safety and privacy are needed.”

“This bill does not create any new rights or entitlements. It simply codifies the definition of sex as biological male and female in existing statutes and laws,” she added. MORE

10 Comments on Kansas legally defines woman as ‘human female’ in new Women’s Bill of Rights

  1. “no Democratic state senators voting in favor of the bill.”
    There in lies the problem.

    ht tp://3.bp.blogspot.com/_CGStBOOy098/Sca9agHMcBI/AAAAAAAAAPQ/R8iMb9f5oCE/s1600/wizardofid1.jpg

    5
  2. Kansas legally defines woman as ‘human female’ in new Women’s Bill of Rights
    ——————–

    What would a woman or even a man be otherwise. God made a woman from the rib of the male. There’s 2 sexes and no more = male/female – period.

    4
  3. The fact that something defining woman as woman is necessary in this f’d up world is ridiculous but telling.

    Two years of this sham and we’re already at this point? They’re certainly going full bore.

    1
  4. Have they defined what a female is yet or does that require another thirty pages of legislation? Or does it depend on what the meaning of is is.

    Instead of redefining every word in the dictionary, wouldn’t it be faster and more efficient to start at presidential level and hang every elected official until we get to the local dogcatcher?

    1

Comments are closed.