Former Department of Justice Chief of Staff Kash Patel has a major theory following the recent news from Special Counsel John Durham’s probe.
During an interview on Fox News, Patel spoke about Durham’s probe into the handling of the Trump-Russia investigation and whether Hillary Clinton’s campaign had any involvement in pushing false information to harm Trump and his campaign.
Patel argued that the first indictment from Durham is laying out a broader explanation of corruption in efforts to funnel information to the FBI in 2016.
Patel also said the sheer length of the 27-page indictment issued last month against cybersecurity lawyer Michael Sussman indicated its importance.
“The John Durham indictment against Michael Sussman for lying to the FBI is normally about 2-3 pages long at max,” Patel said. “A 27-page indictment is reserved for those mob-style conspiracy cases or large scale fraud cases that the Department of Justice brings.” more
No comment.
mmmmm … mmmmmmffffffffff …
Been holding my breath for 5 years, now …
Remember the 45,000 indictments that Sessions was getting ready to issue?
izlamo delenda est …
27 pages of obfuscation.
A long indictment is no guarantee of future results.
Want to get a democRAT’s attention?
Don’t tell ’em you have a long indictment
Tell ’em you have a long endowment!
By the time he’s finished, the perps will all have assumed
room temperature. Gee, how convenient.
“What I believe John Durham is doing is laying out a sweeping indictment so that the American public can begin to understand what the corruption was and who exactly was involved,” he said.”
The American public, those that have been paying attention, already understand the corruption and who exactly was involved, to a degree. What they are now waiting for is perp walks, indictments, and convictions. Until we get those, it’s all political Deep-State masturbation.
I am always encouraged when those in the know believe that a hammer of retribution is about to fall but since I have zero expectations, MEH!!
This is, and has always been, in God’s hands. I’m good with that.
How can I believe anything unless the word “BOMBSHELL” is used?
@aleon — You also have to have a headline that starts with
𝐈𝐓 𝐁𝐄𝐆𝐈𝐍𝐒:
Is Mr. Patel cross eyed?
Let me guess, the walls are closing in.
@Uncle Al
IT ENDS: HILLARY NOT GUILTY!
@TRF
Is a long endowment the same as being endowed with a long one and if not, how would you explain it to a Demonrat?