28 Comments on Katie Hill Ends Katie Hill’s Career
Well, now she can devote full time to her , uh, hobbies.
14
Nope sorry. I can’t spend another 20 secs looking at this ho-bag, much less 12+ minutes. Just another hot mess that has become the standard for a seat in Congress…and the bar was already pretty low. So I guess Kkkkatie did accomplish something after all.
13
Love John Ward’s snark. Just can take his voice in narration…..
7
Give this deluded ‘victim’ another 45 years, if she makes it that long, and Hillary Clinton will still be alive.
7
One sure thing about politics….someone is either phucking someone or someone is gonna get phucked.
11
Another crazy woman in public office. It’s anvepidemic.
5
She’ll be doing bestiality porn in no time.
(unless she has already)
6
I’d hit that.
2
There really is something sick going on.
The Earth, maybe the entire Solar System, is moving through some astronomical putrescent miasma.
(apologies to Madeleine L’Engle)
And all human intercourse is being polluted – we can’t listen to just about anything without hearing a lie. Falsity and pretension pervade every aspect of our lives – from alcohol-less beer to meat-less hamburgers to the abominable “transgender-ed” manifestations of the vicious psychoses that afflict so many.
We “rationally” reject God but embrace the notion of “Ancient Aliens?”
And the mendacities encompass the whole world!
Communist China boasts Billionaires while the so-called capitalist countries are trying to tax their wealthy into penury!
That this creature (similarly to Sandy O’Cortez) was elected is an indication of the absolutely disgusting uselessness of the Media – and a pretty fair indication of the lack of awareness by the electorate.
izlamo delenda est …
12
She Blew it
4
slut….
4
@Tim November 1, 2019 at 7:07 am
> That this creature (similarly to Sandy O’Cortez) was elected is an indication of the absolutely disgusting uselessness of the Media – and a pretty fair indication of the lack of awareness by the electorate.
Because “the Media” decide who is allowed in The Party? “The Media” decide who is allowed in the ballot? “The Media” decide who is allowed in the vote? “The Media” decide how who is allowed to vote, vote? “The Media” decide who is declared “the winner”? “The Media” decide who, declared “the winner”, will be allowed to sit on The Party’s throne? “The Media” decide who will be allowed to remain on The Party’s thrones?
Or “the electorate”?
— I’m Lord Hobson. And I disapprove this message.
I am not wearing pants.
2
Why no, Lord Hobson, because it’s the job of the media to look into the backgrounds and shenanigans (or lack thereof) of EACH and EVERY candidate for office.
The point of reporting is to REPORT – not to decide.
The point of investigative REPORTING is to report the results of some investigation – good, bad, or indifferent.
ANY one aspiring to office should come under scrutiny – these people are supposed to REPRESENT us! Our agents, so to speak. Thus, as our AGENTS and REPRESENTATIVES, they should be above reproach.
Would you hire an attorney who had a history of defrauding his clients?
A doctor who routinely killed his patients?
Shouldn’t you want to know?
Sheesh!
izlamo delenda est …
7
Amazing how these liberal/progressive/leftie bitches are al ugly, dumpy, or a combination of the two. ;^)
6
Seems like the media has turned politics into a game show where the outcome is fixed and the trained seals applaud. Sometimes with the internet you get to look behind the curtain and what do we see? This and more. We grew up watching the news but what it has turned into is a vast left-wing conspiracy. I know it was there before, it’s just they have gone to far and that’s why we have Trump. Fake game show news is dieing and that’s a good thing.
4
@Tim November 1, 2019 at 9:31 am
> Why no, Lord Hobson, because it’s the job of the media to look into the backgrounds and shenanigans (or lack thereof) of EACH and EVERY candidate for office.
To who’s benefit? For what purpose? So you can pretend you “had a choice”? Or so you (yes, you, laddie!) can tell the proles “Well, we gave you a choice. And since this is who you chose, you’ve agreed to be ruled by them. However we see fit.”?
> A doctor who routinely killed his patients?
When this is the doctor the HMO “offers” you, your “choice” is this doctor, or none. Regardless of how “well reported” he is by lying liars who lie.
You get that? Don’t you?
I guess I have a different take on all of this. Women do really dirty deeds to get even with their ex-spouse/boyfriend. Now that it’s turned the other way for the ex-spouse, the lezzie got her come uppins. The ex-spouse did Americans a favor by exposing this corrupt liberal Democrap. She can say whatever, because it will all soon be forgotten. She says she’s going after her ex for the leaks, too late. He made her squirm like a worm that she is. tsk, tsk
1
She provides a good example of why some women rely on makeup!
2
Sorry ladies but tattoo’s have the same visual effect on you as warts. Don’t go there!
5
Within five years she’ll be back in politics. Probably closer to two.
2
The American media had this, all of this, and they are pissed that it got out. It came by way of the British press…. once again.
2
#Repeal the 19th Amendment!
2
Lord Honson just what we need another man who would be king.
Bye ForniKate
“Well, fuck!!
It worked for Kamala…”
2
Well, is it “Hobson” or “Honson?”
Pick something easy, and easy to remember.
Or are you a schizoid man? Whatever …
Either way … did you miss the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs?
izlamo delenda est …
1
@Tim November 1, 2019 at 12:35 pm
> Well, is it “Hobson” or “Honson?”
It’s “Hobson”. If you feel it matters.
> did you miss the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs?
Not at all. But if “x+y=z”, it doesn’t matter what you insist is so special about this x, nor that y. Well, unless the insistence is because the insister is “special”.
Well, now she can devote full time to her , uh, hobbies.
Nope sorry. I can’t spend another 20 secs looking at this ho-bag, much less 12+ minutes. Just another hot mess that has become the standard for a seat in Congress…and the bar was already pretty low. So I guess Kkkkatie did accomplish something after all.
Love John Ward’s snark. Just can take his voice in narration…..
Give this deluded ‘victim’ another 45 years, if she makes it that long, and Hillary Clinton will still be alive.
One sure thing about politics….someone is either phucking someone or someone is gonna get phucked.
Another crazy woman in public office. It’s anvepidemic.
She’ll be doing bestiality porn in no time.
(unless she has already)
I’d hit that.
There really is something sick going on.
The Earth, maybe the entire Solar System, is moving through some astronomical putrescent miasma.
(apologies to Madeleine L’Engle)
And all human intercourse is being polluted – we can’t listen to just about anything without hearing a lie. Falsity and pretension pervade every aspect of our lives – from alcohol-less beer to meat-less hamburgers to the abominable “transgender-ed” manifestations of the vicious psychoses that afflict so many.
We “rationally” reject God but embrace the notion of “Ancient Aliens?”
And the mendacities encompass the whole world!
Communist China boasts Billionaires while the so-called capitalist countries are trying to tax their wealthy into penury!
That this creature (similarly to Sandy O’Cortez) was elected is an indication of the absolutely disgusting uselessness of the Media – and a pretty fair indication of the lack of awareness by the electorate.
izlamo delenda est …
She Blew it
slut….
@Tim November 1, 2019 at 7:07 am
> That this creature (similarly to Sandy O’Cortez) was elected is an indication of the absolutely disgusting uselessness of the Media – and a pretty fair indication of the lack of awareness by the electorate.
Because “the Media” decide who is allowed in The Party? “The Media” decide who is allowed in the ballot? “The Media” decide who is allowed in the vote? “The Media” decide how who is allowed to vote, vote? “The Media” decide who is declared “the winner”? “The Media” decide who, declared “the winner”, will be allowed to sit on The Party’s throne? “The Media” decide who will be allowed to remain on The Party’s thrones?
Or “the electorate”?
— I’m Lord Hobson. And I disapprove this message.
I am not wearing pants.
Why no, Lord Hobson, because it’s the job of the media to look into the backgrounds and shenanigans (or lack thereof) of EACH and EVERY candidate for office.
The point of reporting is to REPORT – not to decide.
The point of investigative REPORTING is to report the results of some investigation – good, bad, or indifferent.
ANY one aspiring to office should come under scrutiny – these people are supposed to REPRESENT us! Our agents, so to speak. Thus, as our AGENTS and REPRESENTATIVES, they should be above reproach.
Would you hire an attorney who had a history of defrauding his clients?
A doctor who routinely killed his patients?
Shouldn’t you want to know?
Sheesh!
izlamo delenda est …
Amazing how these liberal/progressive/leftie bitches are al ugly, dumpy, or a combination of the two. ;^)
Seems like the media has turned politics into a game show where the outcome is fixed and the trained seals applaud. Sometimes with the internet you get to look behind the curtain and what do we see? This and more. We grew up watching the news but what it has turned into is a vast left-wing conspiracy. I know it was there before, it’s just they have gone to far and that’s why we have Trump. Fake game show news is dieing and that’s a good thing.
@Tim November 1, 2019 at 9:31 am
> Why no, Lord Hobson, because it’s the job of the media to look into the backgrounds and shenanigans (or lack thereof) of EACH and EVERY candidate for office.
To who’s benefit? For what purpose? So you can pretend you “had a choice”? Or so you (yes, you, laddie!) can tell the proles “Well, we gave you a choice. And since this is who you chose, you’ve agreed to be ruled by them. However we see fit.”?
> A doctor who routinely killed his patients?
When this is the doctor the HMO “offers” you, your “choice” is this doctor, or none. Regardless of how “well reported” he is by lying liars who lie.
You get that? Don’t you?
I guess I have a different take on all of this. Women do really dirty deeds to get even with their ex-spouse/boyfriend. Now that it’s turned the other way for the ex-spouse, the lezzie got her come uppins. The ex-spouse did Americans a favor by exposing this corrupt liberal Democrap. She can say whatever, because it will all soon be forgotten. She says she’s going after her ex for the leaks, too late. He made her squirm like a worm that she is. tsk, tsk
She provides a good example of why some women rely on makeup!
Sorry ladies but tattoo’s have the same visual effect on you as warts. Don’t go there!
Within five years she’ll be back in politics. Probably closer to two.
The American media had this, all of this, and they are pissed that it got out. It came by way of the British press…. once again.
#Repeal the 19th Amendment!
Lord Honson just what we need another man who would be king.
Bye ForniKate
“Well, fuck!!
It worked for Kamala…”
Well, is it “Hobson” or “Honson?”
Pick something easy, and easy to remember.
Or are you a schizoid man? Whatever …
Either way … did you miss the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs?
izlamo delenda est …
@Tim November 1, 2019 at 12:35 pm
> Well, is it “Hobson” or “Honson?”
It’s “Hobson”. If you feel it matters.
> did you miss the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs?
Not at all. But if “x+y=z”, it doesn’t matter what you insist is so special about this x, nor that y. Well, unless the insistence is because the insister is “special”.