Lesley Stahl: The Media Don’t Love Hillary – IOTW Report

Lesley Stahl: The Media Don’t Love Hillary

lesleystahl

“Who said the media loves Hillary?”

TruthRevolt: CBS News veteran Lesley Stahl doesn’t believe the press favors Hillary, nor does she believe the media favor Democrats. Spoken like a true leftist. 

Appearing on Fox News with Howard Kurtz, Stahl had been asked if the news media are favoring Hillary Clinton this election season and if they’ll be tough on her when the time comes for Americans to cast their votes.

“Who said the media loves Hillary?” Stahl asked with a big smile before going on to deny that the mainstream media have an obvious left-wing bias.   more

17 Comments on Lesley Stahl: The Media Don’t Love Hillary

  1. Lesley who? Another biased bint LSDM (Lame Stream Dinosaur Media) presstitute vampire who can’t see her own reflection in a mirror, and thereby declares, “I don’t see any bias in the media”.

    I wish the entire LSDM “empire” would hurry up and finish going bankrupt. This circling the drain in the turd punchbowl is taking too damned long.

  2. What the hell makes this delusional puppet think anyone, other than Clinton cult members, will believe her?

    Good thing she was on disappearing FIXED FOX, so fewer people had to listen to her lies.

  3. flip,
    Nah. “She’s” too withered and sucked dry of any useful nutrients to make Soylent Green. If you buried “her”, that area would turn into a lifeless desert.

  4. From her point of view I believe she’s being honest. Wrong, of course, but honest. She lives in a world of unrelenting collectivism which is so familiar to her as to be natural and unnoticed. Within that world, to show collectivist bias would require squads of reporters and pundits to crawl after Dead-Eye Dyke kissing the ground where she walked. Because that doesn’t actually happen, and those squads are merely sycophantic and sympathetic, she sees no bias.

  5. Stahl is a babbling idiot. She says with a straight, wait, a wrinkled face that the press was much harder on Jimmy Carter than Ronald Reagan because the press does not trust power?

    And Hillary exudes power.

    So here is her chart:

    Press hates powerful presidents:
    ——————————————-
    Jimmy Carter = powerful
    Ronald Reagan = weak
    Hillary Clinton = powerful

    Got it genius.

  6. Older reporters like Stahl know better. When they spin a story for the Dems/Progs etc they think it’s for the greater good but know deep down that what they are doing is the opposite to what a reporter should do. What worries me are the younger generation of journalists who have been taught to shape and spin stories right from the get go but taught in such a way they don’t realize what they are doing is wrong and they think they are actually being honest, independent scribes of the news in the world. They’re the ones that helped scuttle Cruz, they’re the ones that play down Hillary’s huge blunders. It’s hard to think any of them could see the light of what real reporting is all about after so many years of indoctrination.

  7. Michael Goodwin NY Post 5/8/16

    “Deputy National Security advisor Ben Rhodes boasts that most reporters were too dumb to know or care that they were being misled” (on the Iran deal)
    “The average reported we talk to is 27 years old, and their only reporting experience consists of being around political campaigns,” Rhodes told the New York Times. “They literally know nothing.”
    Amen.

  8. Does a fish have any conception of water?

    They don’t, in fact, love HRC, any more than the average citizen of the USSR loved Stalin or the Germans loved Hitler – but they support her because … well … because they support her … they’ve been given their talking points and will follow them!

    izlamo delenda est …

Comments are closed.