Men Who Identify As Women Will Be Able To Attend This All-Female College, But It Doesn’t Go The Other Way Around – IOTW Report

Men Who Identify As Women Will Be Able To Attend This All-Female College, But It Doesn’t Go The Other Way Around

Women, REAL women, always lose in the tranny Olympics, don’t they?
Thanks, Progressives!

 

DC: Men who identify as or are considering transitioning over to become women will be able to attend an all-female college in Missouri starting in the fall 2019 semester, but it does not apply the other way around.

Stephens College in Columbia, Missouri, updated its admissions policy to open it to students not born as girls, “but identify or live as women” as long as there is legal proof that the man is transitioning over to become a woman or is legally a woman. Those identifying as neither male nor female, known as binary students, will also be eligible to apply, according to the college’s revised admissions policy.

The college, however, “will stop admitting and enrolling students who were born female but who now identify as men or who are transitioning from female to male” to remain “logically consistent.”

Students who transition to men during their time at the college will be required to leave after completing the semester.  more here

 

25 Comments on Men Who Identify As Women Will Be Able To Attend This All-Female College, But It Doesn’t Go The Other Way Around

  1. “…blah, blah, blah,…to remain “logically consistent.”

    they have to be joking. There is nothing logical about it.
    They must not have a very good biology department. Or philosophy.

    6
  2. “Logically consistent”, liberals think they own the language. How about if we were to declare we were going to police the inconsistency of word meanings? Asshole. You know what else drives me nuts? It’s bumping heads with a lib and having them say at the end of them making a nonsensical argument that we have to agree to disagree. One of my brothers said that to me 3 years ago. We haven’t spoken since.

    4
  3. LCD, do you also support their receiving of state and federal funds. If they are self funded they can be whatever they want. If they receive tax dollars (which I’m against for education) they can’t discriminate.

    6
  4. Actually, the crazy people at the school are being “logically consistent.” It is child’s play to apply valid logic to get to false conclusions: all you have to do is accept a false premise. Determining whether a premise is false or true is a matter for epistemology, not logic. Epistemology is the theory or science of the method or grounds of knowledge. (OED)

    a. Everything brown tastes like crap.
    b. This Belgian chocolate is brown.
    c. The chocolate tastes like crap.

    The logic – the syllogism – is valid. But the conclusion (c) is false because the premise (a) is false.

    These gender maniacs have accepted the premise that mental illness takes precedence over biological sex at birth as determined by XX/XY chromosomes (there are some abnormal exceptions but they are very, very rare). They can apply logic all day long and still come up with crap conclusions.

    7
  5. I think Dan has not been clear in his assessment. Too much bourbon or perhaps simply failed to be clear.
    “Speaking the truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act.” Geo. Orwell

    2
  6. I wouldn’t be to hard on LCD. I was serious with my comment. My outlook on life, as far as women, dramatically changed the day my daughter was born. Shit, I’ve driven a ways to terrorize some assholes. LCD is a damn good conservative voice here. Let’s not eat our own.

    5
  7. @Joe6,
    I truly regret your loss. Whilst I will not insist that my surviving brother and I see eye to eye, we do have a level of understanding.
    “Speaking the truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act.” Geo. Orwell

    2
  8. Crackerbaby, I do appreciate your thoughts. It’s my brother that has refused communication. He’s even more hard headed than I am. He’s one of those guys that when he walks into a room he knows he is the smartest person in the room.

    2
  9. @joe – agreed, certainly not!
    @Brad – if I had a daughter I sure hope that I would raise her to not have any interest in going there!

    I like freedom of choice – as long as you don’t force others to change their ways to cater to yours. It’s the libertarian way. But while I support the right to freedom of choice of people at this college I certainly don’t want to support it out of pocket!

    2
  10. LCD, I love ya buddy. Let me interject some real life experience raising kids. SONS, Hey dad, fuck you. A good smack across the chops. Knock their dumb ass right to the ground. Meanwhile, your cell phone rings telling you the bass bite on your local lake is lit. Your sons ready to test your metal. When you say, hey, we need to get to the lake. Their response is OK.
    Daughters, forgetaboutit. Stay single. It’ll scar you for life.

    5
  11. ‘Don’t listen to” this link. It’ll fxck you up.’
    H/T for the warning.
    After scanning a ‘lil’ bit, best advice found was,,,
    Daughters, forget about it. Stay single. It’ll scar you for life.
    Poor bastard that lives next to me, 4 daughters,,,
    Tried to edit and got a pop-up for my ‘Brain Health’,
    Sorry, that’s what I come here for,,
    Sheeeeeeet

  12. “… the man is transitioning over to become a woman or is legally a woman.”
    “… the man is … legally a woman.”

    Is the absolute absurdity of this lost on the College?

    As taxpayers (in Missouri) why haven’t we the right – the obligation – to say “NO – or HELL NO – we cannot, in any moral sense, financially support this absurdity!”

    It’s one thing to force the taxpayers to support socialism, nihilism, stupidity, morons, thieves, liars, murderers, illegal-alien invading rat-people, grifters, con-men (and women), political hacks, toadies, “Green” energy scams, and Carnahan wind farms – but quite another to force us to support absurdities.

    izlamo delenda est …

    3
  13. I have 2 daughters and 2 granddaughters I am far more protective of them than I was with my son. My son now has a daughter about 2 and a half yrs. old with blonde hair and beautiful blue eyes and he is already extremely protective and very proud of her. He’s hoping for a boy (and so am I) next Summer when his wife is expecting their 2nd child. I had 2 rules when my girls were growing up no muzzies and no cruds, my oldest daughter has a great husband. Her first boyfriend however almost got his ass kicked by me and my son when he called her a bitch and she hauled off and slapped the jerk as hard as she could across the face ending their relationship right then and there. I was very proud of her and told her so. I also told them if ever attacked to kick them in the nuts as hard as they can or break their kneecaps or nose. My son in law is also very protective of her and his daughter.

    2

Comments are closed.