NY Times signals Kamala that her White House ambitions are hopeless – IOTW Report

NY Times signals Kamala that her White House ambitions are hopeless

American Thinker:

By Thomas Lifson

In the old days of the USSR, Kremlinologists used to figure out who was in and who was out in the power struggles at the top by looking at the reviewing stand for the May Day military parades. Proximity to the leader was the criterion. With today’s Democrats, an equally shadowy gaggle of power-hungry operatives controlled by hidden hands, we must rely on signals coming from a few semi-official media organs, but preeminently the New York Times.

That’s why a major article in the big circulation Sunday edition of the Times on Kamala Harris is so interesting.

After an introduction with some sympathy for the vice president, feigning balance, came this slap in the face from “dozens” of anonymous party sources “including some who helped put her on the party’s 2020 ticket”:

 But the painful reality for Ms. Harris is that in private conversations over the last few months, dozens of Democrats in the White House, on Capitol Hill and around the nation — including some who helped put her on the party’s 2020 ticket — said she had not risen to the challenge of proving herself as a future leader of the party, much less the country. Even some Democrats whom her own advisers referred reporters to for supportive quotes confided privately that they had lost hope in her.

It gets worse. MORE HERE

14 Comments on NY Times signals Kamala that her White House ambitions are hopeless

  1. Nobody ever, ever liked Kamala. She made it in CA politics because she had sponsorship (mostly Slick Willie Brown). She was picked to be VP after a disastrous primary, simply because she checked two diversity boxes. And at least DNC could sell the premise that Sleepy Joe was likeable, enough for the fog of election fraud to work. Nobody would have believed that with Kamala.

    4
  2. First of all, Kalamity Harris is second banana to a moron who thinks a web site is accessed with a phone number… and she’s not smart enough to see it, but when she opens her mouth it leaves no doubt that she’s cruizin on empty in the brains department. If someone offers her a penny for her thoughts, they getttin change back!

    5
  3. “…up to and [God-forbid] including a nomination to a seat on the Supreme Court should one become vacant.”

    Yeah.

    And we OWN the Senate, so NO ONE could stop us.

    And if we need a vacancy…we MAKE one.

    See Antonin Scalia for further details.

  4. Biden* was Ø’s insurance policy and Harris fills the same role. No matter how inept, corrupt, senile or stupid the president may be, everyone knows #2 would be way worse. She was the only logical choice.

    3
  5. Spiro Agnew, the crooked VP under Richard Nixon was a far better VP than Harris is and that’s not saying much. Some VP years ago under FDR said that being VP was about as worthless as a bucket of piss. Can anyone name a good or average VP that went on to become President other than possibly Harry Truman or Gerald Ford.

  6. I believe, regarding this matter, one of two things will happen. The leftists in control will either; a) convince Biden to not run, or b) assassinate someone that moves KH out of the way, and frame the right for the crime.

  7. I tend to not like her ignorance and pandering, whiney voice and laugh, so I avoid LISTENING to her.

    She doesn’t improve. My young grandchildren would give this woman that (are you real) look and run!!

    And the worse part: SHE HAS SPEECH WRITERS!
    They probably fight to keep their names off any speech delivered by her.

    I am beginning to think MAYBE she cannot READ!

Comments are closed.