Federalist-
Some of the more vindictive church fathers thought the pleasures of heaven included watching the punishment of the damned. The idea is theologically dubious, but a preview of what it would be like is available for us through The New York Times.
Consider a recent piece by Jean Garnett titled “The Trouble With Wanting Men,” which portrays the sexual and relational landscape as a hellscape, or at least a dreary purgatory in which Garnett longs for men who are just not that into her. She is, as she eventually explained, on the dating scene because she recently divorced after her “open” marriage fell apart partially because she fell in love with a paramour who had no interest in a relationship. One writer on X was quick to point out that Garnett had written a long, positive piece about said open marriage only a few years ago. more
WE’RE STILL HERE, WE’RE JUST NOT THERE
ENJOY YOUR ANIMALS
Why by the cow when you can get your milk for a pittance. She and others like her created this world for themselves, they should be happy to live in it. To state the truth otherwise would be an admission they are wrong. You’ve come a long way, baby. No wallow in your own misery.
OK Yeah, I could use a nurse and a purse…
Just send me a financial statement to see if you qualify !!!!!!!!!!
She should actually take the next logical step and write a positive piece about the benefits of having thirty-nine cats.
mustng66 – we used to call that, “No slack for the wicked!” She’s too stupid to understand her own folly.
She is learning the valuable lesson all feminists learn eventually: the type of man she wants doesn’t want her.
These men are driven to put their own dent in the universe; they want a woman who is a complement to their life, not the focus, and the last thing they want is drama, conflict, or bitchy women.
There are plenty of simps out there who will date her, but she won’t respect them and sooner or later, they will move on.
There is a VERY DISTURBING IMAGE of this WHACKO associated with an article she wrote for The New Yorker titled “Giving Away My Twin” July 10/2023.
She is on a bed with her Twin sister straddling her like a Little Girl sits on her mom’s lap. Very Disturbing.
This woman professes SHIT to IMPRESSIONABLE IMBECILES
And how USELESS must the stupid Cuck that she divorced Feel?
You KNOW she has serious self-esteem issues when she abjectly displays her own short-comings with the hope of enticing others to lament her ignorance and stupidity.
“But Garnett doesn’t seem to get this, writing that, “lately I have been bruised by the ambivalence of men, how they can first want me and then become confused about what they want.”
That’s because they figure out she’s a ball biting whack job. That bitch couldn’t deal with a real man.
“There are plenty of simps out there who will date her, but she won’t respect them and sooner or later, they will move on.”
True, but all cucks. This woman has sentenced herself to a very sad existence.
Are you freaken kidding me? I wouldn’t let her clean off my thing. This is almost insulting.
https://nypost.com/2025/07/24/lifestyle/this-new-york-times-piece-is-pushing-man-hating/
@ Bad_Brad FRIDAY, 1 AUGUST 2025, 20:52 AT 8:52 PM
That pretty much sums it up.
As for her misery, I’m indifferent to her suffering. Don’t give a shit one way or the other.
JDHasty
That’s one ugly bitch. By open marriage did she include farm animals? This is a joke right? She must have a great personality.
“Can she bake a cherry pie, Billy Boy, Billy Boy?”
Oh, and an “open marriage” is just an admission you should have never gotten married in the first place. I hope her ex husband has found a true partner and has a long happy life with her.
A good man would never allow himself to be trapped in an open marriage. And a good woman either. An open marriage is just a ticket to a divorce because both partners are unfaithful to one another.
My guess is that the open marriage involved another woman.
^^^^^
Good point. I bet her parents are proud.
Once you are in the remnants bin you have an entirely different set of choices the very worst if which is your complete consciousness of the whole relationship thing. Which you completely fucked up. You thought you were clever, you had things figured to a dainty pointed degree, with certainty. And you were wrong, arrogantly, insistently; a fully sophisticated failure on all fronts relationship.
All the good men are tooken up. So to speak. They were always too simple for you. They still are.
You really gotta have a partner and you in the ‘rem-bin’ you gonna have to learn to make a deal. Nothing natural’s gonna happen now and even if it did, see above, you don’t have it in you.
It all seemed so logical, so progressive and liberated. So advanced.
Feminism is a failed ideology for good reason. This woman lived her whole life outside of God’s purpose and authority as a deviant. Now she’s lonely, desperate, older looking for real companionship…with a real man and wonders why she’s rejected. Irony never has a chance with the left.
That face should be on an iodine bottle. Good Lord.
If you shop at Goodwill, you get used stuff.
I took one look at the B&W photo of her and realized she has Churchill Downs Syndrome!
I followed the links to a few of her articles. What a shallow, self-absorbed, aging adolescent! And what a load of exhibitionist filth she manages to get published in the NYT Magazine and the Paris Review. Maybe if she and her husband had spent as much time talking to each other as she did exposing their private life to her BFFs and monetizing it for anonymous readers, they might still be married.
Her ex is lucky her priorities and transactional attitude became obvious with the ordinary challenges of young parenthood early in their marriage, before he were to find himself foolishly expecting love and loyalty from her through a major medical, financial, or spiritual crisis. I feel sorry for their daughter who is now being raised by this confused and bitter divorcee, and a father who, at best, is a bad judge of character but, from the author’s POV, lacks it as well.
A common parable among men is ” No matter how attractive a woman might be, somewhere there’s a man who’s sick of her shit”.
I’ve seen pictures of this gal, and just gotta say she lucked out getting a decent guy in the first place. And she treated him like shit, and now is living what she asked for.
“Open marriage” = Not a marriage
“Polyamorous marriage” = Not a marriage
Imagine buying a car, but with the agreement that anyone else can drive it. But you still make the payments. You still cover the insurance. You still pay for maintenance. That is how fucking stupid “open marriages” are. They always end up a disaster because they were always about the dominate personality in the marriage fucking whoever they wanted while their “partner” pays the bills or launders the soiled bed sheets.