NYT: Clinton Foundation in Disarray After Hillary’s Election Loss – IOTW Report

NYT: Clinton Foundation in Disarray After Hillary’s Election Loss

Breitbart: 

Three months after Hillary Clinton’s stunning election loss to Donald Trump, her family foundation is facing vexing questions about its ability to exist.

“The foundation is still grappling with its place in the era of President Trump,” the New York Times reports. “It faces some daunting challenges: a drop in fund-raising during the campaign; uncertainty about the scale of the former president’s ambitions; and questions about leadership, including how long its president, Donna E. Shalala, will stay, and whether Mrs. Clinton might rejoin the charity.”

Shalala didn’t shy away from the foundation’s fledgling philanthropic status.

“Last year was a tough year,” she told the Times, “because people were beating on us with nonsense,” referencing the media reports of corruption between Clinton Foundation donors, the six-figure speeches given by Bill Clinton, and the corresponding actions approved by the U.S. State Department while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state.

Indeed, mere weeks after Hillary Clinton lost the election, financial disclosure forms revealed that the Clinton Foundation’s donations had plummeted by 37 percent. Reports earlier this month about the foundation laying off 20-something staffers has ballooned to “about 100,” the Times reports.

more here

18 Comments on NYT: Clinton Foundation in Disarray After Hillary’s Election Loss

  1. What have the Clintons to sell, now?
    Access to pervert parties doesn’t cost $Millions, even in NYC (I’d imagine).
    Epstein’s Island getaway? Don’t need to go through the extortionate Clinton Foundation for that!
    They may still have some pluck in the State Dept., but I doubt it; Tillerson will probably clean out that source of stench with particular gusto.

    izlamo delenda est …

  2. I have always wanted to say this to the Clintons and this may be my last opportunity.

    Mr. And Mrs. Clinton, please note —

    “And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.”

    Jesus said that.

    Matthew 19:24

    I’m not apologizing for offending anybody.

  3. @oolook: According to some sources, the whole reference to a camel could have been a mistake:

    (Following from Wikipedia):

    Cyril of Alexandria claimed that “camel” is a Greek misprint; that kamêlos (camel) was a misprint of kamilos, meaning “rope” or “cable”.

    Schopenhauer, in The World as Will and Representation, Volume 1, § 68, quoted Matthew 19:24. “Es ist leichter, daß ein Ankertau durch ein Nadelöhr gehe, denn daß ein Reicher ins Reich Gottes komme.” This is translated into English as “It is easier for an anchor cable to go through an eye of a needle than for a rich person to come to God’s kingdom.”

    It actually makes more sense than “camel”, doesn’t it?

  4. When her thighness or the horndog come a callin’ on the Hill,the intended lawmaker will always see them….especially when either one has been overseas and has drawings of dead Presidents that they acquired on their trips to “share” with them.
    Same game, just maybe on a lesser scale of largess.

  5. History is going to repeat itself. The feds are going to put the pressure on one of them and they’ll reinstitute the CLINTON LEGAL DEFENSE FUND. Hundreds of millions of dollars will suddenly appear. Clintons know where all the skeletons are buried. They could make life rough for a lot of rich and sleazy criminals.

Comments are closed.