NB: New York Times reporters Michael Barbaro and Monica Davey portrayed Donald Trump’s socially conservative vice presidential running mate as a potentially “dangerous anachronism” in Friday’s “Mike Pence: A Conservative Proudly Out of Sync With His Times.”
It’s all a piece with the mainstream media’s double standard in ideological labeling of the parties, with Pence as a troglodyte social conservative, but no ideological labels for liberal or left-wing potential Democratic vice-presidential choices, like Sen. Bernie Sanders or Sen. Elizabeth Warren. By contrast, The Times itself in Friday’s print edition wrote a flattering article on potential Hillary Clinton running mate Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine, who carries a 90% rating (out of 100) from the liberal Americans for Democratic Action, without once giving him an ideological label (though being a “white man” is seen as a drawback).
Same crap at several of the REgressive sites I drop in on. They’re all singing from the same sheet. As if letting mentally disturbed people use any restroom they want is going to matter when the next box truck comes barreling down their street.
NYT continues its long descent into irrelevance.
I wonder will National Review, The Weekly Standard, and Mark Levin join The New York Times in their attack on Pence. I’m waitin.’
Well whadya want from a paper usually found at the bottom of a bird cage run by a “man” named “Pinch” who carries a murse (Man Purse) otherwise known as a Douchebag!
While I don’t know the guy, he’s growing on me based on the lefties knee jerks.
… Get me a beer, and make me a sammich while your in there.
They’re gonna need to fictionalise their narrative, so much lower, to sink anywhere close to the slimy depths at which Hillary operates.
From the same people who intoned solemnly about Biden jumping in to save the election if Hillary was indicted. Talk about your dangerous anachronisms…
You can usually judge a man by his enemies…
We need more anachronisms from 1776 or so. They wouldn’t put up with this shit for a second.
“dangerous anachronism” yup, dangerous to your limp leftist ideals.
The real question is, why should anyone GAFF about what the Times says, when it appears to exist solely for the progtard branch of the 1%.
Hillaroid could pick Satan for VP. Satan would turn her down. Satan has more principles than Hillaroid.
This is astonishing news considering how favorable they’ve been towards Trump and Republicans in general thus far.
@bob:
I see what you did there. 🙂