OUT OF “THEIR” “MINDS” AT BROWN – IOTW Report

OUT OF “THEIR” “MINDS” AT BROWN

Powerline: A Wall Street Journal reader forwarded James Freeman a copy of the letter received by the reader’s daughter from Brown University Director of Admissions Logan Powell. The reader, Freeman reports, is still trying to make sense of the letter. The reader’s bright daughter had already received news of her acceptance when a letter arrived that was addressed to her “Parent/Guardian.”

Freeman reports:

Oddly, the note referred to the accepted student not as “she” but as “they.” Dean Powell’s letter also stated that our reader’s daughter had no doubt worked hard and made positive contributions to “their” school and community. Our reader reports that his perplexed family initially thought that Brown had made a word-processing error. That was before they listened to a voice mail message from the school congratulating his daughter and referring to her as “them.”

Surely you can guess the rest of the story. As a journalist, however, Freeman sought an explanation:  MORE

15 Comments on OUT OF “THEIR” “MINDS” AT BROWN

  1. In the article, the response from the University stated, “While the grammatical construction may read as unfamiliar to some, it has been adopted by many newsrooms and other organizations as a gender-inclusive option.”

    It may read as unfamiliar because it is incorrect English. You would fail a High School standardized English writing test.

  2. It is sad to see educators place more importance on an ideological fad than the rules of grammar. But I guess if it is OK to self-identify as whatever sex you feel like being today, it is OK to self-identify as an educated person or even an educator.

    Side note: I find it interesting to find that the use of they and their in similar circumstances has usage examples almost 600 years old. This isn’t the same thing as the ideological cretins’ use, but close. Here’s what the OED has to say about it:

    3.B.3 Often used in relation to a singular n. or pronoun denoting a person, after each, every, either, neither, no one, every one, etc. Also so used instead of ‘his or her’, when the gender is inclusive or uncertain. Cf. they pron. 2, them pron. 2; nobody 1 b, somebody. (Not favoured by grammarians.)

    (My bold for emphasis.)

  3. They be gay. It’s the dystopian soft pedaling label for the psychologically damaged gender confused demoniacs who seem to be getting special treatment at the expense of all others.

  4. If kids still used Dick and Jane reader books and leftist weren’t in charge of American education, this would be a non-issue.
    Unfortunately, Dick and Jane have a completely different context in 2017.

Comments are closed.