WFB: A far-left candidate running for Congress in Pennsylvania has criticized a Supreme Court ruling that upheld laws meant to protect sexually abused children and opposed efforts to fund police and mandate minimum sentences for sexual harassment while serving as legislative director for a prominent criminal defense attorneys group.
Scott Wallace, the Democrat who is challenging incumbent Republican Brian Fitzpatrick in Pennsylvania’s first congressional district, is the grandson of former vice president Henry Wallace and inherited a fortune after his grandfather’s company was sold in the 1990s.
Wallace spent years running the Wallace Global Fund, his family’s foundation created in 1995, which has disbursed millions to radical left-wing groups while devoting no funds to organizations or groups located in the district he is seeking to represent, the Washington Free Beacon previously reported. more here
Wallace is just as nuttly and looney as every other dimmocrat running for office everywhere in our great country. An enabler of rights to nambla and other special sexual interest groups. In fact his superhero name is Capt. Fetish.
I said long ago that once the queers were “accepted” by law the next would be transvestites and then the pedophiles would make their move to “normalcy”. Satan works by a method of incrementalism, like putting the frog in cool water and then lighting the flame.
Dem for demicretins, or Per for pervert. These are now interchangeable terms.
Look at this guys website. It’s all folksy and talks about his grandfather being a chicken farmer with no mention of Pioneer Seeds and the Dupont purchase making this guy a billionaire. Even the photos of his family and the house make him look like a hard working middle class man.
He really strikes me as the type that when spending his unearned money on left wing causes decides that’s not enough and he wants a real taste of power and that only comes with political office.
Anyway, Pennsylvania 1st has been Democrat since 1947 so unless the challenger is really willing to attack this guys background (and the way he portrays himself to the public), his causes and his personality it’s likely to stay that way.
I swear, if 1/10th if his fortune dropped out of the sky on me, I’d pretty much vanish from most people’s awareness, not draw attention to myself.
Well it is fairly obvious that this guy is a well funded scumbag. Let us hope and pray that the voters in Penn first can see through his smokescreen
He argued that an accuser’s behavior could have a bearing (especially to a jury) on the “guilt” of the accused. (I know, now “All accusations MUST be believed! All are guilty!“. But, twenty years ago, we were still proudly Fascists.)
He argued that an accuser coached by a prosecution team, hidden from the defense, could have a bearing (especially to a jury) on the “guilt” of the accused. (I know, now “Secret courts are ALWAYS honest! National security!“. But, twenty years ago, we were still proudly Fascists.)
He argued that more shakedowns of the public for more police freebies, automatic guilt for those accused of sexual harassment, automatic guilt for those guilty of this week’s shiny, new gun crime, and other very good things, were not very good things. (Twenty years ago, when we were still proudly Fascists.)
Not for me.
Nor #MeToo.
Don’t hold out too much hope for a state that can’t see Sen. Casey as the nose-running, sniveling, itchy palmed, no eye-contact, son of privilege that he is.
Look at him talk he’s only a yell away from cringing.
I never liked his father, or the republican equivalent Bud Shuster (now the finally retiring Bill Shuster the son) either