CTH: Earlier today Senator Rand Paul delivered his remarks on impeachment from the Senate floor. During his remarks Senator Paul highlighted the real and present danger of allowing agents within government to plot against a sitting president.
Senator Paul asks the same question he presented to Chief Justice John Roberts as the presiding officer of the Senate trial. A question Roberts refused to ask:
“Are you aware that House intelligence committee staffer Shawn Misko had a close relationship with Eric Ciaramella while at the National Security Council together; and are you aware -and how do you respond to- reports that Ciaramella and Misko may have worked together to plot impeaching the President before there were formal house impeachment proceedings?“
This was brilliant. Everyone should really watch this, saw it earlier over at CTH.
Question: IF no one supposedly knows who the ‘whistleblower’ is (Schiff included) and no one is or has been willing to say the damn name?
How did the SCOTUS Roberts know NOT to mention the name??
Paul mentioned TWO names, that’s it, no mention of a whistleblower.
Talk about playing serious chess.
Too little, too late. Thanks, Rand, here’s your consolation prize.
Be sure to queue up with any Republican media whore for maximum photo advantage.
Still think we can exist together as a country, or should we divorce and separate?
This isn’t going to end you know, we ARE at war with each other, hoping to not openly get caught ..
@mithr
powder dry. jerky. elevation. water. good scope. powder dry. maintain situational advantage. powder dry.
You’d think a Supreme Court justice refusing — straight up, cameras rolling, saying “no” — to doing his job, would be an impeachable offense.
Rand asks the question in full view of the nation and yet the old hound dog Barr still doesn’t pick up the scent.