Researcher Andrew Hill’s conflict: A $40 million Gates Foundation grant vs a half million human lives – IOTW Report

Researcher Andrew Hill’s conflict: A $40 million Gates Foundation grant vs a half million human lives

h/t Mrs.6pak

WorldTribune

In a stunning admission, virologist Dr. Andrew Hill acknowledged in a zoom call that publication of his study could lead to the deaths of at least a half million people.

In defending his reversal on the effectiveness of ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19, he discussed his “difficult situation” and said, “I’ve got this role where I’m supposed to produce this paper and we’re in a very difficult, delicate balance.”

The incident is recounted in Robert Kennedy Jr’s New York Times Bestseller, The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the global war on Democracy and Public Health.

Andrew Hill, PhD, is a senior visiting Research Fellow in Pharmacology at Liverpool University. He is also an advisor for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Clinton Foundation. As a researcher for the WHO evaluating ivermectin, Hill wielded enormous influence over international guidance for the drug’s use.

Hill had previously authored a analysis of ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19 that found the drug overwhelmingly effective.

On Jan. 6 of 2021, Hill testified enthusiastically before the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidlelines Panel in support of ivermectin’s use. Within a month, however, Hill found himself in what he describes as a “tricky situation.” Under pressure from his funding sponsors, Hill then published an unfavorable study. Ironically, he used the same sources as in the original study. Only the conclusions had changed.

Shortly before he published, Dr. Tess Lawrie, Director of the Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy in Bath, England, and one of the world’s leading medical research analysts, contacted Hill via Zoom and recorded the call (transcript below). Lawrie had learned of his new position and reached out to try to rectify the situation.

In a remarkable exchange, Hill admitted his manipulated study would likely delay the uptake of ivermectin in the UK and United States, but said he hoped his doing so would only set the lifesaving drug’s acceptance back by about “six weeks,” after which he was willing to give his support for its use.

Hill affirmed that the rate of death at that time was 15,000 people per day. At the 80 percent recovery rate using the drug, which Hill and Lawrie discussed earlier in the call, the number of preventable deaths incurred by such a delay would be staggering — as many as 504,000. MORE

17 Comments on Researcher Andrew Hill’s conflict: A $40 million Gates Foundation grant vs a half million human lives

  1. Gates needs to be thrown in jail for the rest of his miserable life, his entire fortune seized and distributed to the people that have been injured, and the families of all of the people that have died because they were refused treatment with Ivermectin and/or Hydroxychloroquine.

    28
  2. Instead, smarmy Bill Gates gets celebrity treatment. He’s a medical expert, he knows how to provide clean water worldwide, he’s building new nuclear plants in the US after decades of ‘no nukes’.
    He’s fricking unbelievable!!!

    And yet, microsoft products, forced on the world, continue to function unreliably, as always.

    6
  3. This is the state of Academia.
    Bought and paid.
    Globaloney Climate Change, Green Bullshit, CoVid – pretty much everyone’s for sale.
    The chinks have understood this from (at least) the Clinton administration.
    The Traitors in Politics, Academia, Armed Forces, Medicine, and the Media have been selling us out for decades.

    One shouldn’t need to perform a “very difficult, delicate balance” to relate simple facts. That’s confirmation of a complete lack of moral fiber.

    mortem tyrannis
    izlamo delenda est …

    11
  4. Talk about evil.
    Lawrie is right.
    It will, and is, all coming out.
    Think we’ll be seeing resignations to “spend time with family” or to “pursue other opportunities”?

    7
  5. Hill is a sellout scumbag for sure, but he’s not responsible for that much death, because the covid death count is massively inflated bullshit. And while they’re pumping up fake covid deaths, they’re busy hiding jab deaths, which have probably eclipsed actual covid deaths many times over. And this isn’t even counting the permanent injuries from the jab.

    I suppose that a year from now, we’ll be getting an anguished mea culpa from some conscience-stricken bureaucrat or doctor about the deadliness of the jab. As the fifth booster is rolled out. Well, good on them, but the murderous leviathan lumbers on, and nothing changes for the better.

    7
  6. So, as another consequence of all this fraud that has been pushed on the world, it is true that if you are not shot up with the experimental vax and you need a transplant you can not get one. You will be denied a life saving transplant if you are not compliant.
    I just came from my Nephrologist office and the PA told me if I ever need a transplant I won’t get one if I have not had the shot.
    Talk about unethical!
    My first thought was, then I just won’t ever need one.
    Thank-you Father Yaweh and Jesus Yeshua for that!

    4
  7. I’ve seen this sort of Fake Science For Pay before. But in this case it was the NMFS Natl Marine Fisheries Service paying so-called marine institute’s like Mote Marine and Harbour Branch that would concoct bullshit “studies” and “research” that would give cover to whatever latest anti-fishing regulations that the Fed’l Gummint wanted to needlessly impose on recreational fishermen.

    Simply put, scientists are whores. They’ll do anything, say anything to keep that grant money rolling in and damn the consequences & harm their bullshit science does to real people.

    1
  8. @mansfield lovell FJB December 13, 2021 at 1:57 pm

    > Simply put, scientists are whores. They’ll do anything, say anything to keep that grant money rolling in and damn the consequences & harm their bullshit science does to real people.

    It’s almost like the same, the exact same people that are selling titles of Lesbian Basket Weaving, are selling titles of 3D Dildo Printing. Are deciding who will supervise (I think “teach” is racist, this week) the classes. What the curriculum will be. All the same people. Splitting all the same money. For all the same honorifics.

    Why the same results? I’ve got no idea.

Comments are closed.