Reuters then doubled up on the medical reporting by pointing that “secondary immune response stronger after infection than vaccination.”
Becker News: The Reuters cited a “summary of recent studies” that Americans who have been following the actual science on Covid-19 have been waiting to see reported by a mainstream news media outlet.
While the studies cited come with a disclaimer that they raise issues that merit further research, they also echo findings in other medical studies and in the public health data.
The first studies reported on the effects of Covid-19 further substantiate that Delta is not more dangerous for young people than the Alpha variant. Furthermore, it states that “very few children needed to be hospitalized and long periods of illness were uncommon”: more
The people who read IOTW and others already knew the vaccine was never intended as a prophylactic. I’m not generally a conspiracy theorist, but I’ll admit the claims it was intended to “kill the old and sterilize the young” give me pause.
Too right Brown Eyed Girl; from what I’ve read, it destroys the immune system leaving people dependent upon ‘boosters’ to stay “healthy.”
Thank you mommy and daddy guberment!”
Is Reuters now prepared for their facetard ban as, “fake news?” 😳 😳 😳
Slightly OT, it appears that Louisiana is offering criminal record expungement for getting the jab. How desperate!
Natural immunity, from what, certain not from covid-19, no such thing.
Vaccines for the flu make you a dependent for it for the rest of your life. Of course not. The jab kill you, some people yes, but not nearly as many as some claim. Blood clots, covid-19 can definitely give you blood clots, the jab no proof & only hearsay claims.
Hey Anonyhole! Bend OVER! And get ready to get it jabbed up your 🤭