SCOTUS scheduled to vote on whether to take up a challenge to the court’s 2015 ruling requiring states to accept same-sex marriages

(The Epoch Times)—U.S. Supreme Court justices are scheduled to vote Nov. 7 on whether to take up a challenge to the court’s 2015 ruling requiring states to accept same-sex marriages.

However, whatever decision the justices make, it may not be issued today.

Just because the justices are holding what is called a judicial conference on Nov. 7 to consider the petition in Davis v. Ermold, that does not mean the court will necessarily decide on that date.

Sometimes the court fails to decide on the appointed date and schedules a future conference on the petition. In high-profile, controversial cases, it sometimes holds several conferences before making a decision.

If the court makes a decision Nov. 7, it would normally release the ruling the following Monday—in this case, Nov. 10—but sometimes it makes the decision public the same day.

The petition was filed on July 24 by former Rowan County, Kentucky, clerk Kim Davis, who, a decade ago, would not sign marriage licenses for same-sex couples. more

9 Comments on SCOTUS scheduled to vote on whether to take up a challenge to the court’s 2015 ruling requiring states to accept same-sex marriages

  1. How is pretending these mentally broken beasts, that Congress “can” not remove, for the simple reason of their mental incapacity, are able spew out The Law of The Land(TM), any more sane, any more respectable, any less evil, than the sodomite “marriage” they demand?

    4
  2. ^^^Uncle AL 8:07 AM

    In a word: money.

    The government will give aid to “destitute” children (all by definition) but has full intention of getting that money back from the father, if even at a later date. (usually the father is the noncustodial parent).

  3. Remember, California voted it down. The courts shoved it down our throats anyway. That’s probably why we’re no longer allowed to vote on anything anymore. We can’t be trusted to give our royalty what they desire.

Comments are closed.