SCOTUS to reconsider hearing case alleging Biden, Harris, lawmakers ignored 2020 fraud, broke oaths – IOTW Report

SCOTUS to reconsider hearing case alleging Biden, Harris, lawmakers ignored 2020 fraud, broke oaths

JTN: The Supreme Court is set to reconsider whether to hear a lawsuit alleging President Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, former Vice President Mike Pence, 291 House members, and 94 senators violated their oaths of office by refusing to investigate evidence of fraud in the 2020 election before certifying Biden as the victor on Jan. 6, 2021, allowing for Biden and Harris to be “fraudulently” inaugurated.

The plaintiff, Raland J. Brunson, seeks the defendants’ removal from office for violating their oaths.

After the Supreme Court declined on Jan. 9 to hear Brunson’s lawsuit, he filed a petition for reconsideration on Jan. 23. On Feb. 1, the court scheduled the private conference for reconsidering the petition on Friday, when four of the nine justices must vote to grant the case a hearing for it to move forward. MORE

13 Comments on SCOTUS to reconsider hearing case alleging Biden, Harris, lawmakers ignored 2020 fraud, broke oaths

  1. Brunson;
    “Hear my case about this obvious vote fraud and oath breaking that led to the illegal installment of an unelected “president” acting on behalf of a person or persons unknown”.

    Me;
    “No”.

    Brunson;
    “Please reconsider.”

    Me;
    (reconsiders)
    “HELL no.”

    7
  2. well since the U.S. government committed an act of war by blowing up the nord stream pipeline they are therefore illegitimate and can be forcefully removed from office as that act is to protect not only American citizens but the American government as we know it. to not remove would be a crime against humanity.

    11
  3. Gots to be one of the STUPIDEST claims ever. Not their job! Individual states are responsible for tabulating their constitutes. There is a deadline date for certification. By all means the candidates, the Senate president are not even remotely involved in this process, nor should they be. This sounds like a claim outta leftos field of dreams.

    8
  4. Imagine the complete and total chaos if the election were legally deemed to have been fraudulent. Biden and Harris out. Appointments nullified. The cabinet gone. All laws put in effect, all executive orders nullified. Everything that brain-dead pedophile has done, evaporates.

    You think the demcoms are mad now, ooh boy.

    It would be glorious. Almost chubbs me up thinking aboutit.

    13
  5. This issue has features of a legal system in an established nation doing its function. Not enough features to actually accomplish anything at all, but it’s sort of like a model home in a new subdivision made out of cardboard.

    The outlines are similar, but nothing actually functions.

    5
  6. “crimes against humanity”
    And making a shitload of money doing it.

    Some lawyer felt the need for this provision.
    “is of such imperative public importance as to justify deviation from normal appellate practice and to require immediate determination in this Court.”

    3
  7. KevinC. You and 7 up voters do not fully understand the process as it is intended. Take a moment and learn why the congress has to certify the vote and what they are supposed to do if questions of fraud arise. If certifying the vote is meaningless, then why is it done?

    5
  8. Funny & interpret as someone like you would. States certified their votes moron. Once a state certified their votes they can not be un-certified. Claims of fraud, where? When? Over 60 court cases came up empty. This = no standing. Take a minute to learn the voting process!

    1

Comments are closed.