Epoch Times: WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court’s decision Feb. 19 to hear a water pollution case from Hawaii could signal that the court is considering reversing new powers to regulate pollution granted in a recent decision, and reining in some of the regulatory stances of the Obama-era Environmental Protection Agency.
Maui County has appealing a novel Feb. 1, 2018, interpretation of the Clean Water Act by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals that gave the EPA sweeping new powers to regulate pollution that travels through groundwater. more
“O” the Plumber…
Why don’t the asses reverse
their idiocy of calling CO2
“pollution”?
EPA needs to be abolished too.
“Speaking the truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act.” Geo. Orwell
“Speaking the truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act.” Geo. Orwell
Got it
The last 200 times,,
Not offensively meant
His grave may be simple, but the legacy Orwell left is anything but.
Erasing the Marxist Muslim Mouse Dick from history, one day at a time….
Some things need be repeated.
izlamo delenda est …
Know what I mean?
Back to the thread:
Why is an “Act” in need of “interpretation?”
Can’t the humps in the House and Senate write with clarity and precision?
Presidents should return confusing “Acts” and tell the Legislators to clean them up or vote a 2/3 majority.
But, of course, they’re written vaguely so that the Courts must get involved – which is absolute bullshit.
izlamo delenda est …
They need interpretation because politicians can’t (too stupid to) understand anything the read or write.