Supremes Decline to Rule in 3 Immigration Cases – IOTW Report

Supremes Decline to Rule in 3 Immigration Cases

AP/AJC

On Monday, the last day for orders of its term, the Supreme Court of the United States pushed two cases with potentially far-reaching implications for immigration enforcement to its fall term.

Jennings v. Rodriguez concerned whether criminal and terrorist-suspect aliens detained while awaiting rulings by immigration courts must be given bail hearings and be allowed the opportunity to remain free on bail while their case is pending. The plaintiff in the case has been held for over three years without bail.

In Sessions v. Dimaya, the court was asked to consider the constitutionality of a section of the Immigration and Nationality Act defining whether a “crime of violence” makes one subject to deportation. The definition, a crime that “by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense,” is being challenged as unconstitutionally vague.

In both cases the court has decided to wait until next term, when newly seated Justice Neil Gorsuch will be able to participate fully in the proceedings.  – BREITBART

8 Comments on Supremes Decline to Rule in 3 Immigration Cases

  1. “And every new day brings Ginsburg’s incapacitation closer”

    Rumor has it 50 lawmakers have signed a petition demanding she lie down. After all she’s been dead for a while.

  2. Hey B3, (Brother Bad Brad), we’re with ya pal. Just read NRA’s daily report. WTF is in the California water? Fingers crossed. Hopefully the Nation will realize RGB is actually aunt Edna from Family Vacation and do something about replacing her.

  3. Where’s Justice Ginsburg?

    Uh, Your Honor, she thinks she’s Genie…..

    Genie? What is that?

    Uh, Your Honor, Barbara Eden Genie from the show….

    What do you mean?

    Uh, Your Honor, Justice Ginsburg is no longer at home…..she only answers to Genie Sir.

Comments are closed.