The ‘Gay Infertility’ Myth – IOTW Report

The ‘Gay Infertility’ Myth

The Stream: On April 22nd, USA Today published an article titled “The Psychology of Infertility.” The article highlighted three couples who could not have children. The couples chose to have a child through in-vitro fertilization (IVF), adoption and surrogacy. While music played in the background, the couples talked about the trouble they had conceiving. There was only one problem: One couple was made up of two men. “We don’t have a uterus,” they explained.

Got it? It seems that two men can’t conceive a baby! And their problem, we’re told, is one of infertility. Really. Dan and Will Neville-Rehbehn had to spend thousands of dollars to find a breeder, that is, surrogate, to bear them a baby. The men “contributed” the sperm, according to the companion story.

Twenty years ago, their video would have been a skit on Saturday Night Live. Now, it’s a news story on USA Today. And that news story is doing its darnedest to fob off on readers the “gay infertility” myth.  more here

13 Comments on The ‘Gay Infertility’ Myth

  1. Sorry, dudes, but being “born this way” carries a certain set of natural limitations. Changing the language and strapping on the prosthetics of Science® does nothing to change natural reality.

  2. “Twenty years ago, their video would have been a skit on Saturday Night Live. Now, it’s a news story on USA Today.”

    That’s because today’s “news” media has become a joke.

  3. What? No “butt” babies?
    Huh! Who woulda thunk it?
    Stick your dick up some guy’s ass and get nothing but shit?
    Whatta surprise!

    How fukkin stupid can people be? Even the Spartans demanded that they marry (under penalty of large fines) wymyns and got honors for siring chillens.

    Oy!

    izlamo delenda est …

  4. Just when you think liberal madness has reached its greatest height, some piles on more liberal shite.

    You can see where this is going, from space: disability=government compensation.

    More CROOKED bastards seeking payment from the public for their ‘specialness’.

  5. Would a male and female couple who engage in anal sex therefore be considered “infertile” as no pregnancy results? No, we would acknowledge that pregnancy does not result from such activity. No sane person would present this as a case of “infertility.”

    Calling a gay, male couple infertile is simply to validate and present their union as the equivalent of a male and female couple. Leftism owns this lie. They see this as “progress.”

  6. Romans ch. 1 tells us that God considers homosexuality not merely as in but a particular form of judgment upon those with darkened minds.

    That article is all the evidence one could want of those darkened minds.

  7. I am a firm believer that this is natures way of telling you that you are an evolutionary dead end.
    You are in fact, the sludge at the bottom of the gene pool and are need of being removed.

Comments are closed.