The Constitution: In recent months, it seems that left-leaning media sources are engaged in a secret contest to see who can publish the most outrageously absurd opinion and stay in business.
We’ve had Russian conspiracy after Russian conspiracy practically assaulting our eyes and ears ever since the democrats got to licking their wounds on November 9th. There were calls to have Julian Assange extradited or assassinated due to his publishing of Hillary Clinton campaign emails via his whistleblower website Wikileaks. Just this week, we were forced to endure yet another predictable round of calls for the impeachment of Donald Trump for an act that everyone involved has said was routine.
It’s nonsense. All of it. It’s a simple game of quantity. The more absurd headlines the left can cram down your throat, the more absurd you’ll believe that the Trump presidency is. It doesn’t matter whether or not the content supports the headline at all; the left is literally just bombarding us with bizarre, conceptual ideas in an attempt to smother us.
That’s why it comes as no surprise that ultra-liberal, elitist magazine The New Yorker recently surmised that the American Revolution was possibly a mistake.
Karl Marx himself couldn’t agree more.
Then trigger another 1776. There will be no place for any commie to hide.
The NY Times says we might have been better off as a constitutional monarchy, like Canada.
I am surprised I thought the Times always leaned toward a vassal communist state where the moneyed elite provided for the unwashed and unenlightened masses.
The Overton Window has a nice view of other planets these days.
Yeah, that part about ‘all men are equal’ just doesn’t work.
Socialist propagandist. Punk doesn’t even have a real photo by his name.
Pah.
The failing NYT is just parroting what it’s Millenial writers were taught. This has been the Zinn textbook commie revisionist version of US History since the ’90s.
Time for a U.K. Bookie’s pool on the exact date the NYT files bankruptcy, or gets sold for one dollar.
Let’s see, under our messy, uncontrollable, chaotic and frequently confusing Constitutional system of government, we have: led the world in industry, fought a civil war to end slavery, turned the tide of WW I, turned the tide of WW II, provided the means for Europe to even survive both world wars until we got in, blocked the enslavement of much of the world until communist Russia collapsed, protected Israel and came closer than anyone else to peace in the middle east, allowed anyone to protest anything we have ever done, allowed publications like the New Yorker to exist, maintained an era of relative peace since WW I through our military might without conquering and claiming other nations as colonies, built some of the greatest cities in the world from the ground up in a historically short period of time, revolutionized transportation, revoluntionized the modern computer age, sent men to the moon, led the world in medical advancement, led the world in protecting the environment, provided our citizens with the highest standard of living the world has ever seen (where even the poor have cars, cable television and cell phones), provided enough food to overfeed us and provide sustenance for the world, and guaranteed due process to everyone here. Not even Canada, which the New Yorker seems to love and admire, has done this.
Here is a news flash for ulta liberals: unfettered government control cannot accomplish these things – only a free people can. There is no impetus for rulers to innovate because they are already at the top, and there is no need to take the risk of innovation. And there is no need to be concerned with the “little people” so long as sufficient steps are taken to prevent widespread revolt.
So, Mr. New Yorker writer, when you take your limousine to your office, order whatever you want for breakfast, lunch, dinner and perhaps a snack or two, use your cell phone to communicate in various ways while working on your computer in your luxurious high rise office building, and go home to your residence with ample entertainment, comfortable furniture, running water, heat and air conditioning, thank the fact that free people did this – not your vaunted overbearing government system.
Well said, Wyatt.
A motley bunch of damned Yankees would talk such trash.
…. & who wouldn’t be surprised that they believe the Soviet Revolution of 1917 was a whopping success story?
I presume they want to make Obama Queen.
Officially, I mean.
They are continuing the tradition of New York Loyalists. There would have been no Revolution if they would have had their way in 1776.
Wyatt- Game, set and match!
No, but the New Yorker sure as hell is.
Whew! Wyatt said a lot and one should maybe go over it more than once to absorb the gold within it.
I would like to expand on a partial sentence of his that’s extremely relevant.
“allowed publications like the New Yorker to exist,”
DON’T YOU FORGET THAT, ASSHOLES!
I’m sure it’s a lot more than 3% now.
Oh, and Phuck New Yawk.