Gateway Pundit:
Trump Attorney Alina Habba joined Grant Stinchfield on Newsmax TV on Friday night.
President Trump filed a federal RICO suit in Miami, Florida Thursday against Hillary Clinton and others over the Russia collusion hoax orchestrated by the Clinton campaign in 2016 to undermine Trump’s candidacy and derail his presidency.
Alina joined Grant Stinchfield to discuss the lawsuit against several FBI and DOJ officials who spied on his campaign and administration. The FBI used phony documents from the Hillary Clinton campaign to spy on President Trump and launch a Special Counsel against the former president in an attempted coup. The Democrat operatives failed in their mission and now President Trump is going on the offense.
The Plaintiff, Donald J. Trump, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby serves his suit against the Defendants, Hillary R. Clinton, HFACC, Inc., the Democratic National Committee, DNC Services Corporation, Perkins Coie, LLC, Michael Sussmann, Marc Elias, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Charles Halliday Dolan, Jr., Jake Sullivan, John Podesta, Robert E. Mook, Phillipe Reines, Fusion GPS, Glenn Simpson, Peter Fritsch, Nellie Ohr, Bruce Ohr, Orbis Business Intelligence, Ltd., Christopher Steele, Igor Danchenko, Neustar, Inc., Rodney Joffe, James Comey, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Kevin Clinesmith, Andrew McCabe, John Does 1 through 10 (said names being fictious and unknown persons), and ABC Corporations 1 through 10. video at link
Where’s that tubby little cocksucker Vindman?
Is this a civil suit? RICO is a federal felony and I had the idea this would be prosecuted by federal prosecutors, after grand jury indictments being returned with a true vote.
I could be wrong.
Did I miss Pencil Neck Shifty? What the hell?
I’m telling you, I sure admire DJT’s eye for talent.
That is quite a gaggle of vermin you got there.
Although I don’t think Trump has even a one in ten thousand chance of prevailing, I don’t think that is the ultimate goal. Getting all these MF’ers under oath for depositions, getting them on record. Then, his attorneys can subpoena the depositions these rat bastards gave to Durham to see if everything jives.
Trump has the money and the tenacity, never let them off the hook.
@Lowell — The RICO statute allows for civil as well as criminal cases to be brought. A civil suit can result in treble damages.
Rich Taylor
No way Rich. If he loses this law suit his political career is over. Pretty sure he told his legal team wake me up when you can connect all the dots.
Some POS Senator should ask Trump if he can define what a woman is!
@Brad
I don’t think this suit has anything at all to do with his political career. This case could take years to adjudicate and his political shelf life is limited. Keeping its progress in the news, regardless of the outcome, shows the folks that he is still relevant, still feisty, and still hungry to Make America Great Again.
Rich
“I don’t think this suit has anything at all to do with his political career.”
If he loses this law suite every MSM station, including FOX, will remind everyone, everyday, that he lost and there was no such thing as a stolen election. It was fabricated in his sick little demented mind. He has no business running for office, he’s mentally ill. Tell me I’m wrong.
@Rich Taylor March 26, 2022 at 9:12 pm
> Getting all these MF’ers under oath for depositions, getting them on record. Then, his attorneys can subpoena the depositions these rat bastards gave to Durham to see if everything jives.
How hard is it? To consistently “not recall”?
Oh? That will preclude them from “future government service”? That’s the story? That anybody’s sticking to?
Well, it’s not worth arguing over, at least to me, but yes, I think you are wrong, and by a large degree.
Filing a RICO suit makes it exponentially harder to prove and prevail since a concerted conspiracy between all the above actors must be proved. I think all those bad actors were motivated by a hatred of Trump and ran with the narrative hatched by Hillary and her cohorts because it damaged Trump. But conspiring together? Hardly.
And this suit has nothing to do with a stolen election, it is about how the other side fabricated a narrative, a false narrative that ultimately damaged him in the election, as quoted above, “Russia collusion hoax orchestrated by the Clinton campaign in 2016 to undermine Trump’s candidacy and derail his presidency.”
But we can agree to disagree.
Rich Taylor
Don’t really consider it arguing. I consider it examining different points a view. Which are fun to watch play out in reality.
There is a thing called “Civil RICO” that private parties can sue upon. It has no criminal penalties, just money. But a lot of money.
https://jenner.com/system/assets/publications/21107/original/2021_RICO_Guide.pdf?1625754342
Absolutely worthless, will go nowhere, no standing, next.
I have over a hundred mill in the war chest & I’m tired of being sued, my turn to be the sewer.