AmericanThinker […] Even more compelling is the fact that Pagliano’s testimony is not necessary to prove the basic case against Clinton for violating either federal record laws, or those pertaining to handling classified material. In either case the evidence already on the record is sufficient to secure convictions on multiple counts on the basis of gross negligence. But politically, mere negligence is perhaps not sufficient to support a prosecution — thus Clinton’s legally irrelevant and untrue but persistent statements that she never sent any emails marked classified at the time. Pagliano’s testimony might well show conscious intent on Clinton’s part, which while not technically necessary to the case against her, makes it stronger, and thus more politically persuasive. more
11 Comments on What Pagliano’s Immunity Deal in the Clinton Email Scandal Reveals
Comments are closed.
Huff throws Hillary under a bus. The world’s gone mad.
From above: “In either case the evidence already on the record is sufficient to secure convictions on multiple counts on the basis of gross negligence.”
Really? Get back to me when they arrest Hillary. I’ll just be over here, watching that not happen.
0bama is preezy.
The fix is in.
DOJ is a viper den of political hacks to cover all the tracks, there will be no indictment.
Lois Lerner agrees.
She ain’t coated in Teflon, it’s snake oil.
… and Killary will be hauled off to jail in …. 3….2….NEVER
my faith in the American Judicial System is nil
btw, Pagliano is ‘Dead Man Walking’
I would wave a Geiger counter over my food if I were this Pagliano guy
Obo wants this done before he skates away so he can pardon Hildabeast; either because Clintons have some goods on him or because he could scoop up some Clinton Foundation money.
@MJA – you always find the best pictures. WTF is that old cow wearing?
Clinton is the symbol of corruption in America. The bitch must go down! (and I don’t mean on Huma)