Cold Case Christianity:
The more we learn about the origin of life in our universe, the more reasonable the case for God’s existence. The building blocks of life (proteins, ribosomes, enzymes etc.) are formed at the direction of specific nucleotide sequencing in DNA, the largest molecule known. In humans, DNA contains as many as 10 billion atoms. The adenine, guanine, cytosine, and thymine bases in DNA are linked in a particular order to form the genetic code containing the master plan for every organism. The information in DNA guides and instructs the formation of proteins; without it, protein formation would be a haphazard, hit-or-miss proposal. The nucleic sequence in DNA is informational. more
EVERYTHING is the divine. How could it be otherwise?
There are so many complex operations going on inside your body right now it blows the mind. Did you know that magnesium is involved in over 300 processes? Or that collagen isn’t just a skin thing, it’s also what your intestines are made of. Your prostate is mostly zinc and so on. How could this just be random?
It is utterly amazingly idiotic for scoientists to deny the existence of God.
It’s as if they deny the obvious because they believe they are more intelligent than any believer, or fear the consequences for them if they Believe.
Some people are just too ‘smart’ for their own good.
I don’t need dna proof I trust my faith.
The information points to the existence of DNA in God.
The Lord G-d creator of all things is MUCH easier to believe than static lighting striking some Ammonia atoms
Not believing in God and being an atheist are 2 different things. The former aren’t jokes.
Sourpuss: It also make you wonder how the ammonia atoms were created.
Atheists and most scientists feel much more comfortable in a world without God’s rules.
So whatever goes on their numbskulls is undisputable reality, they think.
John 1:1-4
“1In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
2The same was in the beginning with God.
3All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
4In him was life; and the life was the light of men.”
At least this article’s writer is smart enough to say that the data points to the existence of God. Most of these pieces proclaim, “Science Is Proving The Existence Of God”, or some similar foolishness. As though to say the works of ‘science’ (and scientists) are discovering the existence of God, and without such ‘proof’ God must not exist, or his existence is merely theoretical.
It’s like trying to prove my own existence without an I.D. card, as I’m interacting with a bureaucrat. No matter how real I obviously am, my material existence would never be enough to convince.
I’m sorry, but I find attempts to prove the existence of God to be desperate and embarassing.
The intelligent creation argument doesn’t prove “God”. It proves that there are things we don’t know. It doesn’t prove or disprove that there is ONE God, or a personal God, or 1400 different gods, or super-intelligent aliens in another universe that left their detritus in our solar system, or on the vast timeline of the universe that we think we know that we’re anything much more than akin to primitive bacteria who know nothing. And it does not answer the question that an atheist will throw back in your face: if God created everything, then who or what created God.
What is the point of this. Try faith. It’s a choice. Belief is trust and conviction in the absence of proof.
I’d be interested in hearing what all things were made of.
See Stephen Meyer’s works on the evidence – scientific, mathematical, and statistical – from which evidence of God is inferred.
My cousin’s girlfriend’s DNA points towards the existence of dog.
@ 846: learn all about it after your earthly time is up
if u think there was a big bang, then what/who lit it off?