Allons enfants de la patrie,
Le jour de gloire est arrivé!
The stirring opening of the French National Anthem (1792) comes to mind this morning: “Arise, children of the nation, the day of glory is at hand!” Setting aside its call to “drench the land in impure blood”, it seems germane to this moment. That is because I am setting aside my previous calls for patience and belief in our overtime strategy of “four-yards-and-a-cloud-of-dust” to get into their end-zone by November 2022. Instead, I am informing you that there is a 30 yard pass being executed in one week that could score and win the game, and we need your help: the time you can make a difference has arrived.
There is a lawsuit being drafted by Kurt Olsen to be filed with the US Supreme Court on the morning of November 23 (Tuesday before Thanksgiving Thursday, nine days from now). It is encyclopedia, definitive, and includes far more material than has ever been made public. What was filed last December was the result of three weeks’ rushed investigation: what is being prepared now is the result of a year’s worth of investigation, and invokes a novel Constitutional argument that I for one find conclusive.
We want Attorneys General to sign it. There are 26 states with Republican Attorneys General.
Alaska * Alabama * Arizona * Arkansas * Florida * Georgia * Idaho * Indiana * Kansas * Kentucky * Louisiana * Mississippi * Missouri * Montana * Nebraska * New Hampshire * North Dakota * Ohio * Oklahoma * South Carolina * South Dakota * Tennessee * Texas * Utah * Wyoming * West Virginia
Here they are: MEET THE REPUBLICAN AGS
Next week Kurt Olsen, Mike Lindell,* a quant, and a white hat hacker of my acquaintance, are all making the rounds among these AG’s, walking them through the case and asking them to sign up for their states. Thus it is the states which are the litigants in this Supreme Court filing, but unlike the last time this was attempted (last December), this time we have the information that SCOTUS cannot turn away. MORE
Let’s go Brandon.
We need to do everything we can to FJB and his illegitimate government.
“information that SCOTUS cannot turn away.”
Sure they can, and they have, at every turn. SCOTUS had made it perfectly clear that they have not intention whatsoever in re-litigating the last election. It doesn’t matter watcha got, they ain’t interested.
The filing is not written yet, you’re nine days from filing, no State AG has seen it and you want more than two dozen of them to sign it.
You guys need some serious help with scheduling.
Am I missing something? I read through the article and I am not sure exactly what the lawsuit is about. I think it is about the election results. I do not know where it will go. The individual states are responsible for choosing electors and the Congress is responsible for certifying the results. If that is the purpose of the lawsuit, then I completely support it. However, I do not think the John (Diana Ross) Roberts and the Supremes would ever overturn the Pretender-in-Chief
All hat, no cattle.
I’ve already contacted most of the AGs on that list. Told them that it’s time for our nation to have free and fair elections as laid out in the constitution.
Each of the AGs will be visited by Olson and Lindell to give them access to the material they have.
Do more that complain that nothing is being done or not done to your satisfaction. Contact these AGs and ask them to keep an open mind when they meet with these men. Ask them to sign up to have their name added to those demanding our day in court.
BTW, we do not need another ribbon or wristband of a different color. Let’s come up with another symbol. We always mock the left for re-using the same old chants: “hey hey, ho ho, xxxx has to go”, “no justice, no peace”, etc.
So we are supposed to start bugging our AGs to join a lawsuit about which we know nothing? On a promise that THIS TIME they have something really big? And as Rich Taylor said above, it all depends on the supreme court, the same supreme court that told the states that they had no standing.
That article was a might short on detail.
As for the Supremes ignoring this suit: as rich taylor indicated, they can and they will.
RogerF,
How about a noose? For those that will not support the oath they took about defending the Constitution…
scott – are you referring to the door pull on a nascar garage?
DITTO:
“RogerF
NOVEMBER 15, 2021 AT 6:58 PM
Am I missing something? I read through the article and I am not sure exactly what the lawsuit is about. I think it is about the election results.”
At this time, the state legislators are debating on impeaching South Dakota’s AG. I think he has other things to think about instead of joining a last minute filing.
I’ll get on board just as soon as I know what it is that I’m boarding. If this effort lives up to its pre-release hype, I’m all in to get Florida’s AG Pam Bondi to sign on. It is a bad tactic on Byrne & Co.’s part to push this hard for something they’re not prepared to lay out for us to examine.
Uncle Al, I agree entirely! In fact you had to read almost the whole story to figure out what the objective is.
Remember the nurse who quit Kaiser, and posted a video of herself being escorted off the premises?
Look what she organized:
https://www.voices4choice.us/#Home
This seems like a leftist catfishing scheme or marketing ploy targeting conservatives – too much grandstanding and not enough substance.