16 State AGs File Suit to Block EPA Waters Rule – IOTW Report

16 State AGs File Suit to Block EPA Waters Rule

epa

LegalInsurrection- The Obama EPA’s “Waters of the U. S.” power grab has come under a lot of scrutiny and resistance, and rightly so. In addition to citizen outrage and push back from Congress, the EPA is now facing two lawsuits filed by the Attorneys General of 16 states.

Rod Kackley reports:

Texas and 15 other states filed suit to block the new “navigable waters” rule as soon as it was published.

The EPA legal eagles have not one lawsuit to worry about, but two. Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi have filed suit in Houston. Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, Nevada, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming have filed suit in a separate case to have the rule overturned.

“The EPA’s new water rule is not about clean water — it’s about power,” Paxton said.

MORE

 

 

9 Comments on 16 State AGs File Suit to Block EPA Waters Rule

  1. It’s up to the states, not the federal government, to determine which waters are navigable.

    Navigable Waters

    Navigable waters are now defined by nearly all the courts, including the United States Supreme Court, as waters which are capable of being navigated, that is, navigable in fact. This definition is applicable to rivers and lakes.

    According to the federal test of navigability, which has been followed by most of the state courts, the question of navigability depends on whether the stream or body of water, in its natural state, is such that it affords a channel or highway for useful commerce and travel.

    However, State Courts and not U.S. Courts have the right to decide the question of the navigability of a stream within a state, and in the respect, the courts have disagreed very greatly as to what is to be considered “navigable waters” under the rule of a particular state.

    The question as to whether a stream, lake, or any other body is navigable is ordinarily one of fact, and is to be determined by inquiring whether it is used or is susceptible of being used for navigation purposes, with the burden of proof resting upon the party asserting it.

    The importance of “navigability” lies in the fact that the title to lands under navigable waters belongs to the state where the land is located.

  2. Not at all. You will never hear me refer to 0bama as president. I don’t recognize his authority, only the lack thereof.

    I do have a little understanding of the U.S. Public Land Survey System and the laws that pertain to it, and will abide by the rules that I already recognize as valid in my state. A state which is fighting this corrupt government’s power grab.

    Can’t see defining a puddle of water as navigable on a plat. That’s pure insanity.

Comments are closed.