LegalInsurrection- The Obama EPA’s “Waters of the U. S.” power grab has come under a lot of scrutiny and resistance, and rightly so. In addition to citizen outrage and push back from Congress, the EPA is now facing two lawsuits filed by the Attorneys General of 16 states.
Texas and 15 other states filed suit to block the new “navigable waters” rule as soon as it was published.
The EPA legal eagles have not one lawsuit to worry about, but two. Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi have filed suit in Houston. Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, Nevada, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming have filed suit in a separate case to have the rule overturned.
“The EPA’s new water rule is not about clean water — it’s about power,” Paxton said.
From time to time, I have been known to produce a yellow stream. Maybe the EPA would like to regulate that.
Sixteen state AGs? Very good!
May the force be with them.
Good.
Now do something about Eminent Domain.
It’s up to the states, not the federal government, to determine which waters are navigable.
You seem to be under the misapprehension that the rule of law still applies to the Obozo administration.
My birdbath is navigable to the little birdies. Do you suppose the EPA will take it over?
Not at all. You will never hear me refer to 0bama as president. I don’t recognize his authority, only the lack thereof.
I do have a little understanding of the U.S. Public Land Survey System and the laws that pertain to it, and will abide by the rules that I already recognize as valid in my state. A state which is fighting this corrupt government’s power grab.
Can’t see defining a puddle of water as navigable on a plat. That’s pure insanity.
No, but it could very well be under satellite observation. Let’s just say you’d better not get caught letting it go dry.
🙂
What if it was due to global warming?