Hillary won’t use the phrase “radical Islam.” Here’s how she explains it.
“I don’t think we are at war with Islam. I don’t think we are at war with all Muslims. I think we are at war with jihadists. You can talk about Islamists who, ummm, are clearly also jihadists…” (trailing off into a silent sea of idiocy.)
Believe it or not, I agree with Her Thighness, but for differing reasons. I don’t like the term “radical Islam” because it implies there are 2 Islams- one dangerous, one not dangerous.
All of Islam is dangerous. The danger of beheadings, shootings, rapes, assaults, beatings, stabbings, whippings, amputations, hangings, drownings, bombings will follow any resistance to the word of Allah, and the “non-radical” Muslim will not do an Allahdamn thing about it.
There is not a “peaceful Muslim” in the world that is going to step between a “radical Muslim” and the homosexual they are about to throw off a tower, standing up for the man in the name of human rights. There is not a “peaceful Muslim” that is going to stand between a “radical Muslim” and an artist who drew Muhammad that is about to be smote at the neck, standing up for their human rights. I haven’t seen it happen, have you?
I’ve seen the hero Muslim who takes a bullet for a potential victim during a terror act, but that is largely “the fog of war” when their isn’t much to think about.
There is not a “peaceful Muslim” in the world that is not, subsequently, an enemy to western liberty at worst, a do-nothing at best.
If Farook and his wife escaped and sought safe harbor, what are the chances they’d be turned in by a Muslim? What are the chances their safe harbor would be a mosque, or some sort of apparatus of Islam?
If any of the homegrown terrorists (as the left likes to call them) like Dear, Roof or Lanza, escaped and sought safe harbor, what are the chances they’d be turned in by a Christian?
What are the chances they’d have safe harbor at a church?
Old Fog Brain is still trying to get out from under the Fog of War!
Or the fog of a continuous hangover.
99.99% of the world’s muslims want Israel wiped offof the map. I cannot sit in a room and exchange pleasantries with any of these people, much less have one prop me up, comb my hair and check my email.
Obama won, and we got ValJar. If Clinton wins, we’ll get Huma. This country is hanging in the balance.
Islam is a Political Ideology. A deadly and dangerous Political Ideology. There is nothing wrong with opposing Islam, in fact, it is necessary.
http://i0.wp.com/www.southcarolinaliberty.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Moderate-Muslim-Cartoon.jpg
DEMOCRATIC PARTY CONDUCTS OUTREACH THROUGH LEADER OF TERRORIST GROUP
Debbie Wasserman Schultz and company’s disturbing embrace of radical Islam.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/261042/democratic-party-conducts-outreach-through-leader-joe-kaufman
DEATH CULT
http://rightwingnews.com/column-2/the-democratic-party-is-a-death-cult/
There is not a “peaceful muslim.” You can stop right there.
Not that I’m a contributor but nobody posted this since JW did
Allow me to feign importance, but shouldn’t this require intensive, rational discussion considering that America’s getting very quickly infected (similar to Hawaii) with non-assimilating, third world-experiencing Numericans (full citizenship, voting rights, etc.) – 10-20% are sure to be properly trained to agitate for “their rights?”
Every American who cares has to make their children, grandchildren and great grandchildren understand that, just like Progs, not everybody likes America the way it was originally founded – President Reagan’s words about Freedom is only one generation from extinction; it’s not passed down through the bloodstream, etc. –
now they have to show up to school board meetings, city council meetings, county meetings, and if necessary, run for elected office to oppose the eventual, continued “transformation.”
http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/weekly-updates/jw-supreme-court-victory/
DECEMBER 04, 2015
“” Judicial Watch Scores Supreme Court Win
How about a little good news? Your Judicial Watch, on behalf of a group of patriotic Americans, scored a major victory for the U.S. Constitution and national unity before the United States Supreme Court. This week, we convinced the Supreme Court to issue an injunction halting a race-based “Native Hawaiian-only” election in Hawaii. In August, Judicial Watch filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of the five Hawaiian residents and one Texas resident of Hawaiian descent who opposed the discriminatory election process (Keli’i Akina, et al. v. The State of Hawaii, et al. (No. 1:15-cv-00322)).
The Supreme Court victory is remarkable. The JW statement issued to the press puts it all together:
“”
++ apologies for wasting pixels
what ever
Okay NEITHER ONE OF THOSE showed up when first posted and even refreshed so was posted again
I was listening to a dope in the coffee shop defending Hitlery and odinga and moslimes by parroting the “radical jihadists” are not moslimes… gibberish. The waitress, nice lady, son is a Cop, really couldnt make her point that she is afraid of these savages.
I butted in and asked the pud, “Why dont you explain to her what the difference is between a peaceful moslime and a jihadist moslime ?”
He said “the jihadist use violence”.
I asked “to do what, what are they trying to accomplish ?”
He said “I dont know…. trying to defend islime”.
I said “The same islime that the peaceful ones practice, right ? because there is only one islime..”
He stared at me and said nothing. I laughed in his face.
No waste. Great comment.
That is an “OH SNAP” moment if there ever was one!
Libs want to eradicate borders. Get rid of guns.
Islam wants to set up worldwide caliphate.
Oh yeah, and, they use guns .Crickets on that.
“Extreme rightwingers” want to hold on to guns and bibles.
Just re-capping.
I was just having this conversation with FreeLady tonight. I said I did not like the MSM calling them radical. Cause they are not. They were not crazy, radical, acting out, upset, PMSing, they are just islam.