MSM Desperately Trying To Tie Trump To a “PORN FILM” – IOTW Report

MSM Desperately Trying To Tie Trump To a “PORN FILM”

SCUZZFEED makes jackasses of themselves by reporting that “Donald Trump made an appearance in an explicit 2000 Playboy video,” making it sound as if Trump participates in sex scenes.

They then go on to say-

Trump’s role in the porn is relatively benign and centers around him breaking a bottle of champagne on a Playboy-branded limo while several of the playmates are visiting New York City. BuzzFeed News obtained the footage from the online-only Buffalo, New York–based video store Cinema Cornucopia.

Other scenes from the film feature fully nude women posing in sexual positions, dancing naked, touching themselves while naked, touching each other sensually, rubbing honey on themselves, taking a bath, and dressing in costumes.

Ohhhhhhh, you mean like Jimmy Carter doing an interview for Playboy where he was surrounded by pictures of naked women and said that he had “looked on a lot of women with lust” and had “committed adultery in my heart many times.”

78e56de9195e77506869607fbcbfcf68

Carter issue, November, 1976. Patti McGuire touching herself.

 

15 Comments on MSM Desperately Trying To Tie Trump To a “PORN FILM”

  1. I keep trying to think of some angle to “ju jitsu” this porn stuff like “basket of deplorables.”
    The most I can do is LAUGH.
    The Göbbels Newspeak Media are desperately flailing out there…
    POPCORN!

  2. Don’t worry, OneLastTime. There’s not a photographer, nor a camera, that could survive the caustic exposure to Hillary’s nether regions long enough to actually capture a photograph of them.

  3. But wait. I thought the left is pro-pornography. They’ve been telling us for decades what a good thing it is and mocking and smearing anyone who tries to stop it. So even if Trump HAD made a video, why is that a bad thing? It should be something to celebrate, no?

  4. Why is man, anything porn bad, but woman anything porn good ? Don’t women porn stars want men to look at them? I’m confused.

    I call myself a feminist, always have, and by that I mean a woman can be anything she WANTS to be, CEO, Senator, stay at home mom, porn star, and all the while being called a beautiful woman if she is. Where are my sister feminists? Hello, hello. Why is that a bad thing? If a man is called hot it’s not bad, but the reverse is somehow sexist? I want to be appreciated for my brain without giving up my beauty. But what do I know, certainly not as much as the self proclaimed elites that deem the rest of us deplorable.

Comments are closed.