Published on May 16, 2017
In this episode we discuss the revelation that Seth Rich, the DNC staffer who was killed last summer in Washington D.C., was passing internal DNC information to Wikileaks. U.S. politicians don’t have a monopoly on stupid: German politicians are confiscating private dwellings to give to refugees — doesn’t this pose a risk of provoking Germans to revolt? Ann explains that the political right-wing, and even far-right, have been co-opted to advance the sodomitical agenda: another example of many how accommodating error under the label of tolerance just opens the floodgates for more attacks.
Honestly, I can’t handle anymore defeatist shit. I may listen to this in a couple days if my altitude improves.
I hope your altitude improves! Beins a retired submariner
we were scared of altitude and tried to remain submerged.
If we don’t see a German revolution of French proportions,
they have bought off on dying a slow and painful death.
I don’t believe that will happen. My genes tell me that won’t
happen, and I’m a Hessian by descent.
Towards the end they advise standing in line to talk to a man who can forgive your sins so you can know “your slate is clean.”
If that’s what you are trusting in, your “slate” is not remotely clean and you will die lost.
It is God alone who forgives, without any human intermediary. He does it solely on the basis of faith in the good news of His grace: the death, burial and resurrection of Christ Jesus for all your sin AND for your justification. That leaves NOTHING undealt with; it means being declared forever perfect in Christ. YOur “slate” wouldn’t just be as clean as His…it means you would no longer even have a slate before God!
Read Galatians 1:8-9 and be warned: Barnhardt is preaching a false gospel that won’t save her or anyone, and so she is under God’s curse.
grool, read John 20:19-23. Yes, it is God who forgives, but he delegated this to certain men. Those men handed that on, as we see with Paul and Timothy and Titus. This is called Apostolic Succession. The priest in the Confessional had hands laid on him at ordination, and received this delegated authority from Christ in this manner. Thus, yesterday when the priest said to me “Ego te absolvo” it is really Christ who forgave me.
No.
During the period covered by the four Gospel accounts and into early Acts, Christ was sent NONE but the lost sheep of the house of Israel. He said so Himself. That is why even up to around Acts chapter 10, we see believing Jews preached to NONE but other Jews only.
In other words, He wasn’t talking to or about you and me.
Confession of sin was one of the things Jews had to do under the Gospel of the Kingdom, preached at that time. But that’s not our Good News.
Today, Jew and Gentile alike are under the Gospel of the grace of God — a previously unrevealed good news that puts all mankind at no distinction one over the other, for ALL have sinned and fall short of the standard of God. All a sinner need do is trust Him for having sone it all for you.
That means confession of sins is not required under this Gospel because those who have believed it have had ALL sins forgiven (Colossians 2:13).
One need not confess something to get it forgiven if God says is was done away with at the Cross.
There is ONE mediator between God and man and that is Christ. ALONE.
Sir, you do not need priests. They can do nothing for themselves, much less for you. Because His work is finished and complete and perfect, appeals to human priesthoods only insult Him and compound their damnation.
And yours.
Believe the Gospel of Grace. Come to Him in simple trust for complete forgiveness and permanent justification…you’re going to be standing alone before Him anyway, someday, with no one to defend you then. Nor can they advocate for you now.
Go to Him, He welcomes you.
For centuries the Roman Catholic Church has added the traditions of men to Biblical teaching (something Jesus called out the Pharisees for doing); why should this pope be any different?
For example, where in the Gospels, Epistles, or any other part of the New Testament are confessions to a priest described? Confessing ones sins, yes, but to a specific priest (seal or no seal)?
Not going to get into any kind of theological discussion, here (or anywhere else, for that matter), but, hopefully, God’s mercy is as deep and as wide as the Ocean.
We choose how we’re going to act a long time before Judgment Day – so to a great extent, God has very little to judge: given that all the choices were ours.
Deathbed conversions are a tad suspect, but only God knows for sure – and some conversions come from pure, unadulterated fear – not from a true acceptance of Jesus Christ as our Savior and Redeemer – but again, humans discussing God is more absurd than viruses discussing Quantum Chromodynamics.
Oh, Brad, there’s a difference between “defeatism” and “dire warning.”
izlamo delenda est …
I’m kind of with Brad. Ann is so dramatic that she’s hard to watch.
Nidaho is correct. If you read the New Testament, confession to a Priest is clearly authorized by Jesus. You can’t read it any other way. Why would he authorize it if he didn’t think it important.
Note to self: It is important to keep in mind that the Word always survives the short comings of the people who run the Catholic Church. I find that so hard to remember when I read about the current Pope.
The Catholic church broke from the body of Christ 1000 years ago.
The Apostolic succession continues in the Orthodox Church.
The Orthodox do not have Peter. Nor do they do much in the way of evangelism. I am a convert to the Catholic Faith (2012) and I looked at the Orthodox then.
For grool. Look at Malachi 1:11. Where do you find Gentiles in every place offering a sacrifice?
No one has any claim on or inheritance from Peter. Christ had him take care of the little flock of believing Jews within unbelieving Israel. That was the church Peter was head of.
Paul, not Peter, was chosen by God to be the Apostle to the Gentiles. That’s us. It was through Paul, not Peter, that God gave the revelation of the mystery which unveiled the Jew/Gentile Body of Christ, which did not exist during the four Gospels period of MML&J.
You have the wrong apostle.