Explanation as to why an annoying gnat has been banned – IOTW Report

Explanation as to why an annoying gnat has been banned

Sunday, 10 December 2017, 13:52 BFH Uncategorized 19

In case the turd wants an explanation, here it is.

Here is an example of this guy’s comments. This is one where he slams Trump, using the screen name SIR, for mocking a disabled reporter:

 SIR-  when the Predident mocks a disabled reporter, then what can you expect. People (kids) may think that is alright. The country doesn’t have the best example going for it right now.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I have no problem with a jerk coming on here and trying to peddle thoroughly debunked idiocy.

Let me debunk it again for this cheesetoothed ahole-

Trump wasn’t mocking the disability, because:

A: That is a terrible imitation if he was.

B: It’s the same mannerisms he uses when he’s mimicking anyone else he thinks has a ridiculous claim.

In fact, our troll is too stupid to get up to speed. The left (the ones that miraculously had the light bulb flicker in their addled brains) have largely abandoned the claim that he mocked a guy with a disability and instead have moved on to say Trump’s mannerism is not acceptable in general, because it looks like he’s saying spastics are stupid.

Meanwhile, Obama saying his bowling was so bad it was like the Special Olympics wasn’t met with any universal chastising by the left-wing dominated press.

Listen, I could deal with these knobheads all day, they are easily destroyed, but that is not why this idiot was banned.

This is. Here he is, same guy, using the screen name RED.

Red – White Power!!

We do not tolerate people changing their screen names for malevolence. I look the other way when readers change their screen names for comedy purposes – Joey Biden and Larry the Liberal, for instance. If we think it’s funny and productive, it stays.

You will be indefinitely suspended when you change your screen name multiple times to make it appear as if your particular point of view is larger in numbers than it really is. And you will be instabanned when you false flag a comment to make it seem like my blog endorses WHITE POWER as a slogan.

The Power part implies that white people maraud and terrorize the land by banding together and using force against non-whites. That is insulting. That is stupid. There is no such thing happening.

Had the dope written White Pride, that would have been fine.

Never before have I ever thought of saying, “I’m proud to be white.” But in light of the left’s effort to make me feel ashamed to be white, White Pride is a term that seems perfectly adequate in 2017.

 

 

19 Comments on Explanation as to why an annoying gnat has been banned

  2. Good. That infected ass-crack was trying to sound reasonable and within the hour, he’d start threatening people, calling them raycisss, and vomiting Bern-out talking points. He was probably one of those paid trolls roaming the internet. His only job. lol. If I wanted to read brainless talking points, I’d go to MSLSD.

  7. His last appearance was on a post before this one.
    It got me curious so I went to check him out and found his pattern of past behavior. Bern-out douche, nazi tactics. Good riddance to garbage.

  11. All the lurking I do here and yet somehow I missed it. Fine use of the Mighty Ban Hammer though! You know I love me some ban hammer deployment on leftist jerks. WTG!
    iOTWReport.com comments section is the best! Cuz you keep it that way for us. Thanks!

  14. @Fur, many thanks for keeping the riffraff out. Like others I hadn’t yet noticed this guy.

    A wise man once said ” I wouldn’t want to belong to any Club that would have me.”

  16. I saw his first comment saying POTUS Trump mocked a reporter, but I didn’t have the energy or the inclination to push back. I almost feel sorry for people who are so easily fooled. If I’d seen the “white power” comment, I’d been all over it. Glad you banned the fool. Disturbed mind.

Comments are closed.

iOTWreport.com ©2024 ----- iOTWreport is not responsible for the content of comments. All opinions in comments are solely the commenter's.