Should We Destroy the Life of Alan Vargas? – IOTW Report

Should We Destroy the Life of Alan Vargas?

Update: For the record, to answer my question in the title, no I don’t think we should destroy the kid.

My hope would be that this hobby and game of picking off individuals (which won’t amount to any impact whatsoever, except causing extreme misery for one person and their family) will begin to feel disgusting for the left that participates.

I’m not sure that will ever be the case, however.

~~~~

It’s looking a lot like this SJW fabricated a story to go along with a still photo of a woman wearing a MAGA hat to paint her as a bigot, calling on fellow SJWs to ruin her. The person she is debating with said she was never uncivil and never said the things attributed to her.

The liar successfully damaged an innocent woman who happens to support the president and existing law.

So, what should happen to someone who incites mob justice against an innocent party?

story

If one more low IQ lefty writes “put on blast”….

It’s enough to have to endure the left’s attempts at control over people, it’s another to have to endure their moronic expressions.

36 Comments on Should We Destroy the Life of Alan Vargas?

  1. Should We Destroy the Life of Alan Vargas?
    I’ve read the article. Let’s give Vargas a little time to come to his senses and call off the “blast.”
    .
    .
    .
    .
    OK, time’s up. Destroy the little fucker.

    44
  2. Of course, Twitter will do nothing. She should sue the hell out of him and his parents. Make them pay a price for willful lies, in an attempt to harm someone.
    Then sue twitter as an accomplice.

    33
  3. He’s already destroyed because he believes the left. Maybe a bit of cold, hard truth coming down on him will fix him and set him on the right path.

    20
  4. Even under Mosaic law the context of an “eye for an eye” meant that punishment was meant to be equal; not for example, two eyes for an eye. And, it was meant to be adjudicated by the law, not carried out by vigilantism or mob rule. So, no, we shouldn’t destroy anyone’s life — as much as we would like to. That would make us no different than the ignorant, vicious people this twerp is and represents. But, there are ways of exposing and shaming him for his lies that are perfectly reasonable and should be applied. Under normal circumstances, telling his mother would be a good start. Otherwise, dog his social network. And if he’s here illegally, turn him in to TBP or ICE.

    13
  5. I see an ignorant kid who hero-worships that Hogg kid and wants to monetize his fifteen minutes of fame. He needs a history lesson intervention.

    24
  6. They have to invent “hate” episodes because they just don’t happen near as often as they wish they would for their victimhood narrative.

    Do you think for a minute they would give any quarter to a conservative of any age? You know they wouldn’t. So yeah. Destroy the little fucker.

    15
  7. Wishing you all the best of luck in junk piling this shit bird. He started it.

    But it’s a TwitterAttack, which I understand somewhat, but very few people hang there and their assault can probably be ignored. If not, use the legal system to disembowel the kid and any others who enabled this pied piper.

    Chihuahua vs. steel toed work boot.

    Tuck Fwitter.

    14
  8. Well, he’s a bully and a liar and quite proud of his ability to spin people up. Plus he’s making t-shirts of the image from the meeting to target the woman. I’d say he should get some justice for that. No, I’m not being specific.

    11
  9. @AbigailAdams:

    …it was meant to be adjudicated by the law, not carried out by vigilantism or mob rule.

    The govt’s adjudication is unreliable.

    So, no, we shouldn’t destroy anyone’s life — as much as we would like to. That would make us no different than the ignorant, vicious people this twerp is and represents.

    I respectfully beg to differ. There is a very important difference: Vargas without justification or provocation initiated an action that caused very real harm to an innocent person. Those who would use extra-legal means to retaliate are defending the innocent person. You may well still arguably find fault with the use of extra-legal means to damage Vargas in the hope of preventing similar future attacks, but you cannot justifiably call those who would do so “ignorant, vicious people.” In fact, I think you should apologize for calling them that.

    9
  10. I saw this photo over at the D.U. the other day. Someone made a thread and put it up there juxtaposed with a civil-rights era photo of a white woman appearing to yell at a black girl. My first thought was one or both photos were likely taken out of context or the story distorted in some way to cause maximum, unthinking, Leftist Rage. It pains me to be correct.

    Expose the kid on social media and dox his parents. They’re the legal guardians of this minor child and bear some responsibility should the victim be harmed physically or economically. This is tantamount to online bullying which is being taken seriously these days (ahem).

    4
  11. It’s like feeling sympathy for a rat………that is until there’s enough of them to chew your house down then you realize you can’t show mercy.

    7
  12. @Uncle Al — It is tempting to meet an attack in the same way as the attackers. In fact, there are many situations in which that would not only be acceptable, but really the only way it can be done. In this case, I don’t think so. It’s not about being virtuous, per se, but there is at least a guide to follow in order to form an opinion or plan.

    “but you cannot justifiably call those who would do so “ignorant, vicious people.” In fact, I think you should apologize for calling them that.” Huh? Whu? I wasn’t calling them that. I was saying that to react in kind to this situation is no better a plan. You trying to pick a fight with me? 😉

    David Hogg and this twerp are not the hill I want to die on. Baby thug wannabes. Give them more air and sunshine and they’ll grow into bigger noxious weeds than they already are. We should be setting our sights on the leaders, not the towel boys.

    2
  13. @LocoBlancoSaltine: I chose my side when I voted for Reagen years ago and I haven’t switched sides ever. I’ll help fund the Revolution or CWII as it’s being called. Patriots unite!

    3
  14. @AbigailAdams – No, I don’t want to pick a fight.

    I was reacting to your words, which seem pretty clear to me:

    That would make us no different than the ignorant, vicious people this twerp is and represents.

    I’ll take your reaction to my comment to mean that you didn’t intend to be taken literally. I do indeed hope that’s the case.

    2
  15. I have no sympathy for the twerp.
    I’m just not into this doxxing thing that destroys one poor sap.

    I’d much prefer to neuter the entire movement politically, and the more they do this to the right, the more the center is going to peel away from these fascist freaks.

    4
  16. @Uncle Al — I’m not sure what you’re seeing in my comment but I only meant, very seriously, that to act in kind is — in my opinion — no better a plan than the one this kid is using. He’ll be found out and it will only hurt the Left because of it. People are getting wise to the Left’s methods, you know.

    1
  17. “I’d much prefer to neuter the entire movement politically, and the more they do this to the right, the more the center is going to peel away from these fascist freaks.”

    Oh great. Now what am I supposed to do with these copperheads I gathered for his home and car?

    1

Comments are closed.