I don’t know of it’s Java Script or not, I just liked my title.
I could have done a joke about Bulger’s coffee, or Skanka, or Fapwell House. But I’m above that.
A spokesperson for the company told NBC News on Thursday that the viewing of “egregious content” has always violated the java giant’s policy.
But now, after years of pressure, the company plans to introduce a new tool next year to prevent customers from watching porn in its shops.
“Starbucks has had a tremendous opportunity to put its best foot forward in protecting its customers from images deemed obscene and illegal under the law, but they haven’t budged, despite their promise two years ago and despite the fact that they voluntarily filter this same content in the UK,” Hughes continued in the statement.
The only time I go to Starbucks is when I have to use the free shitters there.
They’ll compromise and allow tranny porn.
Previously, they wanted to lecture customers about white privilege. Now, they want to lecture them about prurient community standards.
Inside every barista is an adjunct Sociology teaching assistant frothing to get out. They put the dur in Emile Durkheim.
At least Starbucks is doing the right thing this time. More than I can say for the public libraries!
It’s Starbucks; not Starfucks.
Sounds like a starbucks porn title contest in the making.
Or maybe not.
Maybe this will cut down on the creepy loiterers. At least until some black rando sues them. Vilatin’ muh sivvarites, y’all.
Remember when shame and embarrassment were the tools that prevented you from watching porn in public? Good times, good times.
Looking at 12 year old boys getting boned up the wazoo by a fat, 45 year old male isn’t porn.
It’s art!
Or sumting like that.
Fappachino
Midnight Espress
Perverts in Portland OR hardest hit, and that represents a large segment of the residents therein
Homeless discrimination
…but it’s IMPOSSIBLE to describe ANY Democrat “leader”, ANYTHING they DO, EVERYONE they REPRESENT, or ANY of their platform WITHOUT it in some way involving porn…
…a pervert walked into a Starbucks one day…
No, not the start of a joke. It’s just the typical Starbucks customer…
“Looking at 12 year old boys getting boned up the wazoo by a fat, 45 year old male isn’t porn.
It’s art!”
…actually, @Burner, it’s not a 12 year old boy, it’s Barak Obama. The 45 year old man is “Michelle”, and it ain’t “art”, it’s a usual day with Barry and Company.
…so Starbucks will HAVE to scrap the porn filter, or their preferred customers will not get to see their preferred president in his preferred position…
“Come inside Starbucks!”
(I just couldn’t change the spelling of ‘Come’ to you-know-what. I was raised by Victorian parents!)
Stay away from the ejaculate-A-Latte.
I hate going into places like this, McDonald’s, Panera, etc.
It’s so creepy to see people sitting by themselves, with a cup of something from the establishment, with their laptops.
It’s not a, oh I’ll just grab my lunch and check my email type thing. These people are likely camped out there for hours.
Never been in one, their coffee sucks. And after this and if that goes on in there I never want to.
Society has degraded to the point I give up.
“Starbucks has had a tremendous opportunity to put its best foot forward in protecting its customers from images deemed obscene and illegal under the law..”
Like the images of degenerates performing sex acts in the bathrooms or shooting up in the back corners of the dining area?
Liberals amaze….I mean DISGUST me.
Guess ole Stormy is SOL…CPL also as a bonus
“I’ll have a Grande Latte and a dollop of Hand Lotion”
Java Script at Starbucks? I went there once. Paid $7.50 for burnt tasting coffee which resulted in a Java Sh!t.
“Gimme a Turkish Special with a creme filled corn muffin, Jeremy.”
From now on when a customer asks for a “double-pump” it will just refer to the flavoring added to the coffee.
You definitely don’t want to order your Chai topped with “the cream of Sum Yung Gai” (gratuitous Wayne’s World reference).
I would like to have StarFux define “egregious content”, and “images deemed obscene and illegal under the law”.
To me, it sounds like a fat excuse to copy FB and Twatter, and block conservative content.
only class ‘A’ losers camp out at starpukes with all 2 of their electronic devices in tow acting like they’re running some kind of all important earth shaking business. when in reality they’re all just NPC’s or non in-valids tryin to catch a ride as an Impostor on the next spaceX launch at Gattaca.
so i say to Howard Schultz, you can jam that scone and lube it with the foam from my triple grande latte.
None of ‘US’ are (IMO) going into starbucks so it doesn’t affect us. WHO really goes to a public place to view porn? Really? If so …. why? I really do not get it if it happens – and since I refuse to go into starbucks (I am really pissed that my PC wants to capitalize that word) so I never have seen this in the first place.