Rumpled-Looking Hack at Esquire Calls the President’s “Stunt” Dangerous – IOTW Report

Rumpled-Looking Hack at Esquire Calls the President’s “Stunt” Dangerous

Friday, 18 January 2019, 18:30 BFH Uncategorized 29

This guy looks like he smells of dandruff, burnt popcorn, plaque, and blue jeans sat in cat urine. He’s Charles Pee Pierce.

Esquire-

There’s a difference between political hardball and petty revenge. Often, this distinction is not a clear one. Luckily, this president* has made making that determination much easier than it used to be.

Dear Madame Speaker:

Due to the Shutdown, I am sorry to inform you that your trip to Brussels, Egypt, and Afghanistan has been postponed. We will reschedule this seven-day excursion when the Shutdown is over. In light of the 800,000 great American workers not receiving pay, I am sure you would agree that postponing this public relations event is totally appropriate. I also feel that, during this period, it would be better if you were in Washington negotiating with me and joining the Strong Border Security movement to end the Shutdown. Obviously, if you would like to make your journey by flying commercial, that would certainly be your prerogative.

I look forward to seeing you soon and even more forward to watching our open and dangerous Southern Border finally receive the attention, funding, and security it so desperately deserves!

Jesus H. Christ on Hollywood Squares, what a petty little person he is. In addition, this was not just a playground stunt. Pelosi’s trip was a guarded national-security event. Until it wasn’t, because the president* needed to throw his juicebox across the room. I’m sure he thinks he won, too. That letter to Pelosi will hang on the wall of the library one day. Right next to the rigged pinball machine.

~snip!

This idiot says Pelosi’s trip was a guarded national-security event, after Pelosi said the SOTU should be postponed because they couldn’t guard this event requiring national security, without a whiff of self-awareness.

And what peril was Pelosi put in, security-wise, exactly?

 

 

29 Comments on Rumpled-Looking Hack at Esquire Calls the President’s “Stunt” Dangerous

  1. A Republican that hits back at a childish and petty leftist? How childish! How petty!

    The left is dumbstruck that Trump won’t let them kick him and beg for more.

    Their world is upside down.

    Turn-about is fair play, Madame Speaker. You’ve been schlonged.

    31

  4. “And what peril was Pelosi put in, security-wise, exactly?”

    Exactly, none. Inbound US planes give the Taliban priapism. As such, we keep a lot of people in uniform making sure they ain’t within range. The local “friendlies” ain’t, as we know they are prone to kill our service members designated as ‘trainers’ and we’re finally getting around to the point of view that anybody in Asscanistan really ain’t your friend.

    They do however like our money and are willing to kill the villagers down the donkey path in exchange for that. Truth be known, they do that anyway just because they always have. It’s a cultural thing, and they don’t expect westerners to understand. We mostly haven’t.

    But Pelosi’s ass was never in any danger from the indigent of Asscanistan. We spend billions a month making sure of things like that.

    Tell me again, how much does the president need for that wall?

    12

  6. Pelosi tried to buy 17 commercial tickets to Afghanistan without using a secure connection or protocol. US security on the ground in Afghanistan picked it up and was alarmed so they alerted the State Department that the information had certainly been noted by the bad guys.

    Pelosi should be hugging Trump for saving her, Schiff for brains and the rest of the plane from being blown out of the sky like Seal Team 6.

    18

  13. Cool thread idea, Fur — “What Does This Leftist Smell Like?”

    With this guy, I’m going with pumpkin spice coffee, bay rum and a hint of clean adult diapers (he seems a bit, ummm…fastidious).

    8

  22. I don’t even get “Jesus H. Christ on Hollywood Squares”. What??? I have never heard that before.

    I see no humor or cleverness in that. Maybe that’s how Esquire dudes talk to each other? Maybe it’s an inside joke? It just doesn’t make much sense.

    This guy could just as easily be a writer for Vogue, with or without sex reassignment surgery.

    2

  23. @Molon Aabe.

    That announcement, I believe, is the one we’ve been waiting for. Lower the boom, announce an emergency, and get the friggin’ wall built.

    This time tomorrow, the liberals will be bleeding profusely out of their orifices.

    5

  25. I think it’s time to stop all the misuse of our military assets for unnecessary junkets by Congressers.

    There is absolutely no reason that Pelosi and her cadre of Dems had to go at taxpayer expense on any of these frivolous PR jaunts. (And no, protecting and transporting the Commander in Chief and/or his wife does not mean that the military becomes a transportation service for the likes of Congressional Representatives conducting no necessary official business. Pelosi represents the interests of a little district in California. We have a State Department for foreign affairs.)

    6

Comments are closed.

iOTWreport.com ©2024 ----- iOTWreport is not responsible for the content of comments. All opinions in comments are solely the commenter's.