It’s not xenophobic or racist to protect our country from socialists, communists, progressives and America haters – IOTW Report

It’s not xenophobic or racist to protect our country from socialists, communists, progressives and America haters

Look at these stupid cows.

The wretched Daily Mail

No, bints, America wasn’t conceived on the vision that you dummies HAVE for America – open borders with a complete welfare state, filled with people who have no allegiance to our country.

I’m sick of the left using shields – minorities and children, to destroy this country.

17 Comments on It’s not xenophobic or racist to protect our country from socialists, communists, progressives and America haters

  1. “…socialists, communists, progressives and America haters”

    …simpler to just say “Democrats”. That automatically means all that, and so much more…

    21
  2. Anonymous
    JULY 15, 2019 AT 7:48 AM
    “I don’t care who you are, if you stand against my country you stand against me!”

    …that’s kind of the POINT. They want you DEAD.

    …haven’t you noticed?

    13
  3. The Left has cultivated a Cloward-Piven wet-dream!
    It’s all about destroying everything America stands for.
    We are their biggest prize.
    Take down America, take down Western civilization.
    It must NOT happen!

    A wise man once said:
    You and I have a rendezvous with destiny.
    We’ll preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on earth, or we’ll sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness.

    But make no mistake about it, this is history that the Left doesn’t dare teach our children!

    15
  4. They have to dispel their deep seated notion of the ideology that America is the worst country in the world before they stop trying to flip America into their vision. Ironically, they are changing America from the best to the worst country to adhere to moronic ideas of making it better. You’d think the ugly freshman with bed sheets around her head who was rescued from a shithole would have more respect, but instead she leads the charge of transforming America to a shithole. Worse yet, native born Americans back her as a protected class. There’s only one thing that would make America better: Get rid of the traitorous democrats/communists/satanists/rinos so they can’t be elected as frickin leaders. A basic litmus test would weed them out.

    10
  5. The left woke a sleeping giant and it elected Trump (best thing that could have happened!) And now it’s awake and they’re just pissing it off!
    Trump will win in 2020 by a landslide!

    18
  6. It will be 1968, 1972, 1980 and 1984 redux. The democraps have pissed off the average American to the point that they’re almost universally hated by anyone who has a sense of honor and decency and still believes in the American dream. It’s going to be a political bloodbath that they don’t see coming because they still think that they’re morally superior to us with their progressive Anti American worldview.

    13
  7. I’m taking your comment below the pictures and posting on a fb post where Maine libidiots are praising the African illegals as though they were visiting royalty.

    I am so sick of these types.
    Thank God we have a POTUS who has the spine to say what we’re all thinking.

    12
  8. I’ve been thinking lately about how it is that the fact of our settled form of government, a constitutional republic, shifted into the realm of debate. Digging back into the memory hole, the Leftists of the world seized upon a new term coined in science at the time (1970’s) by Kuhn — “paradigm shift” — to breathe new life into their despoiled and contemptible Cold War era philosophies. By the 1970s most Americans — even those who never picked up a newspaper or talked politics — dismissed the Left’s ideas for what they were: the radical ravings of a “the lunatic fringe.” But using the popular scientific term, they were able — as they have done throughout their campaign — to piggyback on the world of science to give a pseudo-intellectual heft to their otherwise repugnant political ideology; to actually legitimize the very idea that our form of government isn’t “settled science.”

    That, I believe, more than anything, is responsible for the error in thinking shared by lots of Americans today, particularly anyone under fifty years old. And it’s related to, but not exactly the same thing as the concept of “post-modern relativism.” PMR is a descendant of Kuhn’s Paradigm Shift, as it was co-opted by psychologists and later pressed into use by the burgeoning school of “social science.” Kuhn’s revolutionary thesis on “new” science became the universal, albeit inapplicable, shoe horn that has shaped our cultural “worldview” (another of the many new words/phrases spawned by the movement) for the past 50+ years.

    As daunting a task as it may be — and probably is — we must turn the tide of this thinking using the same scaffold on which it was built: to reclaim the science behind it and challenge its *settled-ness*. There are many (and some recent) scientists who think Kuhn was wrong, and they’ve published their own findings to prove it.

    Let your mind ponder the implications of reversing the “settled science” of Kuhn’s theory regarding Paradigm Shift. One place to start is in today’s headlines: “The Science is Settled, Life Begins at Conception.” There is nothing ambiguous about that. It is a scientific fact. Now, whether life continues after conception becomes a matter to be dealt with under the auspices of something else — but its disposition is no longer debated under the heading of “science.”

    Once the misapplied, pseudo-scientific template is cleared away from so-called social sciences, the facts of our country’s founding, our form of government, and all the rest stand again in stark relief from the counterfeit country the Left has created. The fact of precedence and law, courts, congress and the Constitution emerge from the shadows and prove just how settled we are.

    12
  9. The media produces a shadow world.
    They no longer report, they advise.
    They state opinion as ‘fact’
    The premise is to create an air of inevitability for their cause.
    If we are not strong they will win.
    If they win we or our children will be sent to the gulags.

    9
  10. The socialists promulgated the prevaricative “scientific socialism” on their first reading of Marx (c. 1860).

    After Cyrus (the Great c. 600 BC) made lying a legitimate path to power, every politician since has employed it to some degree.

    Socialists have dishonestly argued about the “scientific” nature of their oppressions and destructions of nations for the past hundred years and have been countered (mostly) by silence. “Scientists” are (seemingly by nature) a timid lot and few have the fortitude to endure the calumny of straying from the herd. The days of Galileo, Priestly, and Fermi are over – our Universities turn out “scientists” now, who pursue the gov’t grant, not “Men of Science” as in the days of old who pursued “truth” or, at least, “facts,” and attempted to understand the seeming convolutedness of the Universe.
    Thus, “scientists” will either jump on the bandwagon (whatever it may entail – Globaloney Warming, Climate Change, Illegal-Alien Invaders are Good for America, &c.) or shuffle around mumbling meaningless platitudes in the hope that no one interferes with their grant process.

    If enough noise is produced to drown out the music, then the kakophony predominates (obviously). The same principle applies to light and shadow, truth and falsity, Good and Evil – one doesn’t have to extinguish the light (one cannot) – it is sufficient to block, or otherwise obscure, the light. Similarly to our Air Forces dropping tons of tinfoil confetti to confuse German radar. Sadly, for us (Americans), we ceded the education of our youth to the socialists (nihilists, Satanists … whatever) and their despicable Unions a century ago and don’t even seem to be aware that a problem exists.

    Reality will bite us in the ass, and a bunch of us are gonna be really surprised.

    To anyone who actually reads this: I apologize for stating the obvious – again.

    izlamo delenda est …

    7
  11. Notice how the left has framed what President Trump tweeted as “go home“.

    That’s NOT what he said. Here is the thread he tweeted:

    “So interesting to see “Progressive” Democrat Congresswomen, who originally came from countries whose governments are a complete and total catastrophe, the worst, most corrupt and inept anywhere in the world (if they even have a functioning government at all), now loudly……
    ….and viciously telling the people of the United States, the greatest and most powerful Nation on earth, how our government is to be run. Why don’t they go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came. Then come back and show us how….
    ….it is done. These places need your help badly, you can’t leave fast enough. I’m sure that Nancy Pelosi would be very happy to quickly work out free travel arrangements!”

    What he said was, since these people are trying to tell us how to run our country, why don’t they go back to where they came from, FIX their problems (like you are telling US how to fix OUR country), and come back when you are done and tell us how YOU did it.

    Of course, they ignore the FIX part because then they would have to do more than just flap their lips and ACT all virtuous. Fixing things is NOT what they are about. Their aim is to destroy.

    8

Comments are closed.