Ladies and Gentleman—> Twitter – IOTW Report

Ladies and Gentleman—> Twitter

Calling Trump’s tweet abusive should warrant a congressional hearing. Law and order is now “abusive” according to the left. Get them on record saying so.

The urchins over at Twitter are scum.

13 Comments on Ladies and Gentleman—> Twitter

  1. “The urchins over at Twitter are scum.”

    Political pond scum. They’re going to ‘save the world’ from US but will soon learn that the world without US isn’t worth saving.

    9
  2. OK.

    Where is the “behavior?” It’s a tweet, you fucking morons!
    Where is the “abusive?” Words cannot “abuse.”

    “[A]busive behavior” implies an act – a willfully violent act.

    My comment may appear to be nit-picking, but it seems that the Twitter urchins are extraordinarily disingenuous in their efforts to thinly disguise their political censorship.

    Can the Post Office censor mail?
    Can TPC (The Phone Company – see “The President’s Analyst” w James Coburn) censor calls?
    Can Western Union censor telegrams?

    Then why are the Twits allowed to censor?
    Or the maggots at Facebook?

    izlamo delenda est …

    9
  3. The force is Constitutional and law enforcement. Because any ‘zone’ or enforcement of a ‘zone’ on federal property or state, or county is pretty much considered a hostile invasion. Even if the hostiles are US citizens and dumbasses on a sunny day. Oh, by the way, if there’s an illegal alien or a person with a green card mixed in with the crowd, it’s automatic deportation. Bye bye!

    5
  4. Twitter claimed Trump’s tweet “violated their policy against abusive behavior, specifically, the presence of a threat of harm against an identifiable group.”

    Please name the identifiable group. Right. You can’t.

    6
  5. Apparently Twitter doesn’t care if sticks and stones break bones, if your a Conservative, but name’s and word’s will always hurt me if I’m a precious snowflake. Twitter is a rot gut sewer.

Comments are closed.