Wisconsin State Supreme Court Justice, Jill Karfosky (Former Dane County Circuit Judge, elected 2017) gave Trump Attorney James Troupis all of 1:20 minute into his opening argument before interrupting and declaring that the lawsuit challenging the legitimacy of over 215,000 ballots cast in Dane and Milwaukee county “smacks of racism.” Here
I’m watching yesterday’s proceedings this morning on Wisconsin Eye, a service that makes court and government proceedings available online. To watch the arguments made before the Wisconsin State Supreme Court you have to set up a free account. The proceedings can be found Here
Given that this was the first time a court actually heard the argument of an election challenge case, what happened at the Wisconsin State Supreme Court is an important chapter in the fight to stop the steal. A ruling is expected before Monday Here
I don’t think this suit stands much chance of success with this judge (who seems to think Black votes unquestionably belong to Biden).
The guy barely said his name and his credentials before this bitch started interrupting with bullshit.
It’s racist to expect some people to not break the law.
Seems like the Trump team should be able to demand an impartial judge.
Human excrement. If I could I would. No one would miss that piece of trash.
President Trump has totally exposed the rampant nationwide corruption in every level of our govt
The magic word that never is old. I spent a few hours in detention in ’58 +’59 because defending Ike’s Operation Wetbak “smaked of racism”.
I wrongly said in 59 that the word would be so overused that it would be meaningless in 20 years. WRONG!
Stupid scrunt couldn’t keep he mouth shut; just gave the plaintiffs grounds for appeal. Although too late to do any good.
I can’t wait for the mass roundups, yellow stars and the book burnings. Coming soon…. In a few short weeks we are gonna have to pick a side.
The IQ level required for a higher court should at least be double digits.
A question for the justice, if a challenge to the election was, truly a racist attack on highly diverse areas, isn’t it on the clerks, poll counters and election officials to conduct an election in those areas so beyond repute that the terrible racist president would have absolutely no grounds for a challenge?
Not the slip shod, rule bending, law breaking completely bias way that the election and recount were conducted instead. I mean it’s almost like those in charge in Milwaukee and Madison acted as if they were immune because they could count on justices of the state supreme court to scream “racism” as a counter-argument against their ramped misbehavior?
As usual, it’s the racists calling non-racists racists.
I thought the gal holding the scales was blind. Did she have Lasik?
That dame needs a good shmack in the fache, or a shlug from a .45.
Humphrey Bogart interpreting Sam Spade.
“Smacks of racism”.
Smack her. Twice.
Make it thrice!
These justices suffer from TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROM! They know full well their state cheated, and there is enough electronic evidence and written testimony of poll watchers to substantiate the claim I am not sure why they are acting like race has a part in all of this but it’s really starting to get on my nerves. NO COUNTY HAS THE RIGHT TO CHEAT THE REST OF US OUT OF OUR VOTE….it doesn’t matter who lives there!!! Bide has sold us out to China….if this vote goes his way we DESERVE EVERY DAMN THING WE GET!!! WE WILL BE IN COCENTRATION CAMPS!!! BELIEVE THAT!!
BTW….Let me also remind you, KAMALA HARRIS ISN’T ELIGIBLE to be either President or VP anyway. Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 states:
“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.” According to Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the U. S. Constitution, a candidate for the Presidency must be a “natural born citizen,” that is, a second generation American, a U.S. citizen, whose parents were also U.S. citizens at the time of the candidate’s birth.
That there is a difference between “citizen” and “natural born citizen” has been clear since the writing of the U.S. Constitution on September 17, 1787 and its ratification on June 21, 1788.
@Stacia – she can just claim her Kenyan parents came to Hawaii to have her born.
STSCIA
JOHN ROBERTS. in ’08 the UNIPARTY ran 2 men who were not”natural born citizen”s!
Again BOTH liberal parties ran men not “eligible” – before John Roberts.
naming names: Obama, mcCain
Stacia DECEMBER 13, 2020 AT 5:45 PM
But then you see, they will agree and instead of validating my suggestion eons ago that it would be Chlamydia Harris and not Dementia Joe it will become Piglousi…
wi “jidge” – keep sucking sniffer j. robinette grobiden ****