Courthouse News
The Vermont Law School can cover up murals that it believes are racially insensitive even though the artist objects, the Second Circuit held Friday in a case that pitted artistic freedom against the post-George Floyd effort to rectify images of the past that no longer reflect contemporary social attitudes.
Although a 1990 federal law protects artists against having their works modified or destroyed, the law “does not mandate the preservation of art at all costs and without due regard for the rights of others,” U.S. Circuit Chief Judge Debra Livingston wrote in a unanimous 39-page opinion. More
This artwork was so loud the school had to put acoustic panels over it. – Dr. Tar
Shall we ape-laud this decision?
St. Floyd of Newark is already COVERED IN LIES!
Bad as determined by…??? ‘Misinformation Experts’? The same ones who said the jabs were safe and effective, that masks worked, that we need to shut down the economy to save, well, the old people even if it destroys the lives of younger ones? Those people???
Does this include Hunter’s droppings?
This new law will not protect all of the art by our ancestors that was destroyed, but it will protect all the criminals that they worship now.
Robert E. Lee Statue – Bad.
Raping children – good.
FJB & the global oligarchy.
You burn the US flag, but not the pride flag. That would be ‘hate speech’.
I think they just criminalized the removal of graffiti and ‘tagging’
Total fucking bullshit.
Whoever owns it can do whatever the fuck he wants with it.
The courts are eroding the concept of private property.
mortem tyrannis
izlamo delenda est …
Is there a law that says it shall be displayed? Take it down and put it in the basement.
Wild Bill,
I was literally thinking about that Last Night.
there are only 2 things you CAN NOT BURN:
1: “That” Flag
2: “That” Bible
We all know the one.
Everything else is fair game for the Left.