Vatican Standing Firm on Gay Couple Blessing – IOTW Report

Vatican Standing Firm on Gay Couple Blessing

Breitbart

The head of the Vatican’s doctrinal office has dug in his heels in the face of growing opposition to his controversial decision to allow the blessing of gay couples.

Argentinian Cardinal Víctor Manuel “Tucho” Fernández, a personal friend of Pope Francis and the new chief of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF), said Thursday the new document does not change traditional Church teaching on homosexuality, but only on the nature of blessings.

The Vatican declaration titled Fiducia Supplicans was welcomed with joy by the LGBT lobby, which embraced the new teaching as a “huge step forward” and “an early Christmas gift” for LGBT Catholics. More

Remember when the Catholic Church use to burn people at the stake for “unnatural acts?” Those were the days. – Dr. Tar

25 Comments on Vatican Standing Firm on Gay Couple Blessing

  1. Remember when the Catholic Church use to burn people at the stake for “unnatural acts?” Those were the days. – Dr. Tar

    My, how we’ve lost our way. Strange how, throughout history, we always seem to think We know better. That “freedom of choice” thing is Our test, in this life. Choosing eternal life over eternal death;… kinda of a no brainer.

    8
  2. “Remember when the Catholic Church use to burn people at the stake for “unnatural acts?” Those were the days.” And during those same days priests were diddling young choirboys left & right.

    2
  3. 23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.

    24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:

    25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

    26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

    27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

    28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

    29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,

    30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,

    31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:

    32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
    -Romans 1:23-32

    5
  4. anywho … who is surprised that the ‘Infallible Word of God’ is for Homosexuality

    … he’d lose the vast majority of his homosexual pedophilic parishinal & cardinal advocates & recruiters

    1
  5. btw, thanks for equating the word of Trump w/ the ‘Infallable Word of God’

    I’ll take it … he does the Lords work better than the Popester … for sure

    3
  6. No such thing as “gay couples.”

    Pairs of perverts … maybe.
    Homosexuals pretending to be devoted to each other … maybe.
    Dysfunctional duos … maybe.
    Butt-buddies … maybe.
    Coupl’a cocksuckers … maybe.

    But no – not “gay” – not ever.

    Surrendering the language is surrendering the argument.
    Surrender NOTHING.

    mortem tyrannis
    izlamo delenda est …

    6
  7. ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ Saturday, 6 January 2024, 0:25 at 12:25 am

    ^^^ Trump & the fags again …. stick w/ the story

    give it a rest, already ….. buhjeebus!
    —————–

    I did stick to the story. It must nudge the conscience somewhat to say it’s okay for one and not for the other? So, it’s an abomination and blasphemous for one, but not the other? I understand hypocrisy rules. Thank you “Bible” above, not many really care, and that too nudges them the wrong way.

  8. These are not necessarily the End Times, but most certainly are times of Revelation (revealing).

    Just because some clown claims to be infallable (!! let that sink in), dresses like a holy functionary, and rides in a cool Popemobile, you don’t have to swallow the crap he peddles.

    Know them by what they do. Judgement of him, the Church, and each one of us, is solely in God’s hands.

    2
  9. “9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,

    10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.”
    I Corinthians 6:9-10

  10. “So, it’s an abomination and blasphemous for one, but not the other? I understand hypocrisy rules.”

    Not going to get embroiled in this debate, but if an observation is allowed –
    one said “I want your vote” or “I’m working for you” and the other, presumably speaking for the Lord God Almighty, told his priests to Bless them in the name of the Lord.

    Large difference.

    Take it for what it’s worth.

    mortem tyrannis
    izlamo delenda est …

    1
  11. Tip of the ice berg if you ask me. If you start condoning homosexuality then having gay and pedo priests in the open is a natural next step and no longer necessary to hide.

Comments are closed.