Kamala Harris: ‘I Have a Glock’ Of Course I Fired It
Breitbart
When Democrat presidential candidate Kamala Harris told “60 Minutes” she owns a Glock pistol she did not mention residents in her home state of California cannot own one because of a law she supported.
California has an “Unsafe Handgun Act” (2001), which bars the importation and/or sale of any gun that does not meet certain safety requirements set by the state. Consequently, the state maintains an approved handguns roster, which lists the firearms the state has deemed safe, according to California standards.
The roster is what would-be California gun buyers reference to learn what handguns they can legally own. Read more
She ain’t got no glock
It’s blowing up in her face – but not literally. That’d be fun to see happen.
probably still looking for the external/manual safety – to be sure
She said it so generically, as a synonym for a gun. Like Kleenex.
Most Glock owners automatically state the model number. She has small hands so would probably have a Glock 19.
Bitch is as inauthentic as a $10 Rolex.
SMDH
Glock has had episodes in which it was the flavor of the day or current thing and as a general rule has enjoyed popular acceptance due to that factor. There are also applications wherein it is among the top choices to select from. I’ve never really warmed up to it, but I had one under the seat of my Scout for a month or so that had no rear sight. It was in the “Tupperware” that G-19s came in and I needed to drop it off with a friend who was the factory service center to have the sight replaced under warranty. It was an adjustable sight model and half the sight flew off into the atmosphere the same day we sold it. We took it back and he took a fixed sight one after all. See, my advice to buy the fixed sight one wasn’t so bad after all. But I diverge, the gist of this story is I had a coffee can full of 9mm a guy gave me. All factory ammo. But I didn’t own a 9mm. All mixed up leftovers from partial boxes due to pilferage and whatever. My buddy and I happened to be at the range and decided to shoot it all up with the Glock with no rear sight. I’m here to tell you, that thing didn’t hiccup once and we were shooting baseball size groups at fifteen or twenty yards with it. All we really did to sort the ammo was try and load the lighter weight bullet loads in the same magazines and the heavier likewise. Other that that early adjustable sight issue, we never had any problems with them other than a comfortable holster for a Glock was a pipe dream back then. Even though I didn’t care for the trigger action, I sure didn’t have any problem getting respectable accuracy shooting it. Particularly with no rear sight on it.
They are as ugly as a Democrat protester though.
Unsafe operators more likely than not outnumber unsafe pistols by something like a thousand to one.