See If You Can Find the Possible Flaws in This “Study” – IOTW Report

See If You Can Find the Possible Flaws in This “Study”

Tuesday, 22 October 2024, 8:00 Dr. Tar Uncategorized 21

Headline: Infants died at higher rates after abortion bans in the US, research shows

CNN

In the year and a half following the Supreme Court Dobbs decision that revoked the federal right to an abortion, hundreds more infants died than expected in the United States, new research shows. The vast majority of those infants had congenital anomalies, or birth defects.

Earlier research – spurred by a CNN investigative report – found that infant mortality spiked in Texas after a 6-week abortion ban took effect in 2021, and experts say the new data suggests that the impacts of the bans and restrictions enacted by some states post-Dobbs have been large enough to affect broader trends. More

The study is behind a paywall so I can’t comment on their research methods, population samples or the robustness of their findings. CNN seems to be focused on Texas, yet the Study is titled “National Trends in Infant Mortality in the US After Dobbs.”- Dr. Tar

21 Comments on See If You Can Find the Possible Flaws in This “Study”

  2. I’m guessing that the “study” didn’t include the infants that didn’t die from being aborted (murdered in the womb) in their comparison group in order to conclude that infant mortality was up. I’m sure that the vast majority of the living infants that weren’t aborted that otherwise would have been without the ban weren’t part of the statistical analysis. And I’m equally certain that the babies previously murdered while in the womb weren’t counted a infant deaths in any prior studies.

    15

  3. Hmmm…I wonder what else was happening with a vengeance in Texas, and along OUR WHOLE SOUTHERN BORDER, starting in 2021? It’s a real puzzler.

    Ding, Ding, Ding! Give that reader a million IOtWBucks. But that’s just for starters. What else might have been going on at the time that could’ve contributed to the number of birth defects in this country? – Dr. Tar

    14

  4. Considering that CNN is the source, I suspect that wrong data was used, data was fabricated or data was suppressed or maybe they just pulled a story out of their ass… you know like Russian Collusion and Hunter’s laptop. These people are so agenda driven that the Truth has no chance of survival in that toxic atmosphere and their credibility is swirling around in the toilet bowl!

    8

  5. Almost certain categorical error. By selecting only infants the study propaganda authors are excluding babies whose pregnancies were aborted. There are multiple abortion methods, but all of them require killing the baby. Those killings aren’t counted because they’re in the wrong category.

    The outcome of a successful abortion is the same as infant mortality. Yet if you read to the end of the article, they seem to be suggesting that women keeping their babies are somehow adversely affected by Texas’ strict abortion laws. That would seem counterintuitive. I would add that there’s no indication that the women of Texas who lost their babies due to birth abnormalities sought abortions and couldn’t get them or intended to have their babies all along, which would seem like the whole premise of the study. – Dr. Tar

    5

  6. Huh, and right after the jab was developed and forced on millions.

    Yeah, that one came up in conversation over this study. I’ve looked up a few publicly available studies that all seem to find no adverse effects, but most call for more research. – Dr. Tar

    10

  7. Couldn’t possibly have anything to do with the non-immunizing genetic-modifying therapeutics that millions of sheeple took in response to the COVID terrorist attack? That would be foolish to believe that conspiracy…

    10

  8. …you dont suppose gestating mothers who got the SaFe AnD eFfEcTiVe jab that was NEVER given the mutanagenic or teratological studies that are done for EVERY OTHER DRUG may have been a factor as well…

    12

  13. There is a cemetery S E of Phoenix, with an area dedicated to the very young. You can see a 2-month-old here, a three-year-old there, dating back several years. Since 2021 there is an unusual number of babies whose date of birth and death are the same. Tragically, there are also mothers buried alongside their newborns. The jab???

    6

  14. These are examples of what babies died — post-birth rather than pre-birth. If you believe that every pregnancy is of a cute intact baby, please educate yourself by searching these terms on google (with “safe search” off):

    Gastrochisis.
    Sirenomelia.
    Craniothoracopagus.
    Acardius.
    Acephalus acardius.
    Anencephaly (no brain).
    Rachischisis.
    Iniencephaly.
    Rasopharyngeal teratoma.

    4

  19. Here’s one: more infants die of these diseases than in prior years might be because more infants were allowed to be born.

    Here is another: some infants who died after birth probably died of diseases inherited from their parents, who came from places further south of the US with probably higher infant mortality than the US.

    A useful study would be a comparison of infant deaths after the abortion ban to a year prior to millions of poor and diseased persons crossing our border.

    CNN: tells more lies than seen and heard on a million golf clubs, the ones with members and the ones in golf bags.

  20. “Infants died at higher rates after abortion bans in the US, research shows”
    That’s such a stupid argument.
    So what? At least they got a chance to live rather than being murdered in the womb.

Comments are closed.

iOTWreport.com ©2024 ----- iOTWreport is not responsible for the content of comments. All opinions in comments are solely the commenter's.